How Does Sediment Redistribution from Rivers Affect Earth's Angular Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
Sediment redistribution from rivers, such as the Mississippi, affects Earth's angular velocity by altering the distribution of mass, which can lead to a decrease in angular velocity as mass moves away from the axis of rotation. The discussion clarifies that the focus is on Earth's rotation rather than its revolution around the sun. The participant suggests that the mass moving farther from the axis results in a slowing of angular velocity due to changes in moment of inertia. Additionally, it is noted that a person dropping from a rope cannot start spinning after release because she has no initial angular momentum, regardless of changes in her moment of inertia. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the effects of mass redistribution on rotational dynamics.
physics1331
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Many rivers, like hte Mississippi River, flow from north to south toward the equator. These rivers often carry a large amount of sediment that they deposit when entering the ocean. What effect does this redistribution of material have on the angular velocity of the earth? Why?"

"A person is hanging motionless from a vertical rope over a swimming pool. She let's go of the rope drops straight down. After letting go, is it possible for her to curl into a ball and start spinning? Justify your answer."


Thanks


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First, I am guessing that the question refers to the Earth rotating about its axis, not revolving around the sun. If I am right on that part, would the effect be that it slows the angular velocity? The only reason I think that is the mass is moving farther away from the axis of rotation.

My guess is no because initially she has no angular velocity, meaning that she has not angular momentem. Thus, even if the moment of inertia changes, she will still have zero angular momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct, on both. For the first one, you might want to specifically mention the effect on the moment of inertia.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top