How Does Sliding Affect the Force Exerted by the Road on a Truck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Truck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the force exerted by the road on a truck changes when crates are stationary versus when they are sliding. When stationary, the force is calculated using the equation Fn = (2m+M)g, while sliding crates exert a reduced friction force due to the coefficient of kinetic friction. The maximum acceleration before sliding occurs is defined as as = μg, indicating that if the truck accelerates beyond this point, the crates will not keep pace. Once sliding begins, the friction force between the crates and the truck decreases, affecting the overall force the road must exert on the truck. Ultimately, the force exerted by the road is greater when the crates are stationary compared to when they are sliding.
leaf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two crates of mass m are stacked on the back of a flat-bed truck of mass M. The truck accelerates from rest with a uniform acceleration a.
How does the force exerted by the road on the truck change when the masses are stationary vs. when the masses are sliding on the floor of the truck?

Homework Equations


Fn = (2m+M)g
Ff = μs(2m+M)g
as = μg (as is value of acceleration beyond which crates begin sliding, and coefficient of static friction between crate and truck is μ)

The Attempt at a Solution


The first two equations above are the equations I got for the force exerted by the road when the masses are stationary, but I'm not sure how this would change when the masses are sliding. It doesn't seem to me that they would, but maybe I'm missing something. The part of the question asking for force exerted by the road when the masses are sliding comes after a question about the value of as so I'm thinking that maybe that has something to do with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If they slide, their acceleration is not "a" any more. What does that mean for the horizontal force between the lower mass and the truck?
 
  • Like
Likes leaf
Your second equation has a ##\mu_s## and (since it is ##\mu_s F_N## for truck + crates), it means ##F_f## is the maximum friction force between road and truck. ##\mu_s## is a coefficient that has to do with the tyres and the road surface, not with the crates! If the truck accelerates with less than ##m_s g## the actual friction force is less than ##F_f## !
##\mu## in your third equation is what ?
If you really mean ##\mu_s## then it seems a coincidence that your as is indeed the maximum acceleration the crates can have without sliding !

Let me -- for clarity :smile: -- use ##\mu_c## for the friction coefficient between crates and truck bed.

When the crates are sliding, they can't exercise more than the full ##2 \mu_c mg## on the truck bed, so they don't accelerate with a but with a smaller acceleration ## \mu_c g## . The road still hat to provide all accelerating force, but for the truck it is a and for the crates it is less than a.
 
  • Like
Likes leaf
Thanks for the help, but I'm still a bit stuck.

BvU, μ in the third equation is the static friction between the crates and the truck and μs is the static friction between tires and road.

The friction force between truck and crates would decrease to μmg when the crates begin sliding I believe (\frac{1}{2}μ is the coefficient of kinetic friction between truck and crates given in the problem and the combined masses of stacked crates is 2m), but I'm still confused about how this relates to the force between truck and road.
 
leaf said:
μ in the third equation is the static friction between the crates and the truck and μs is the static friction between tires and road.
I agree that ##a_s = \mu g## is indeed the maximum acceleration the truck can give the crates. And that maximum acceleration requires a force ##F_{\rm truck\rightarrow crates} =2 \mu mg##. With a simple free body diagram of the truck loaded with the sliding crates and accelerating with an acceleration ##a > a_s## you can now symbolically write down the force the road has to exercise on the truck.

If the coefficient of kinetic friction is lower than the ##\mu## we used for static friction, then that ##\mu_k## takes the place of the static ##\mu##.
But it can well be that your answer doesn't have to be all that specific and all that is wanted is a qualitative answer ('smaller', 'bigger', ...)
 
  • Like
Likes leaf
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top