How Does Slit Separation Impact Interference Patterns in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taliaroma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how slit separation affects interference patterns in physics, particularly the spacing of dark bands in a double-slit experiment. It is established that increasing the distance between slits (d) results in dark bands becoming closer together. The relevant equation is provided, with emphasis on isolating the variable y to determine the distance between dark bands (dy). The conversation highlights the need for clarity on which dark bands are being referenced and confirms the correctness of the initial formula used. Understanding the relationship between slit separation and interference patterns is crucial for solving related problems.
taliaroma
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the difference between the pattern resulting from
-2 slits, each 0.02mm wide, separated by 0.2mm AND
-2 slits, each 0.02 mm wide, separated by 0.4 mm


Homework Equations


lambda = 2yd / (2m-1)D, m = 1,2,3, etc.
D = distance from screen (where pattern is displayed) and slit
d=distance between slits


The Attempt at a Solution


I said that the distance between the dark bands would decrease, to which my TA responded "which dark bands?" I'm not quite sure what he's getting at, and what the actual answer to this question is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first off, you are right, the dark bands will get closer together; and you are right not to know what your TA is getting at, because i don't either.

now, we still need to show that the bands will get closer together. your formula is correct, but you should isolate y, because that is what we need to work with. so, the distance between dark bands, call it dy, will be the difference in the value of y for consecutive values of m. what you need to do is find an expression for dy, and see how it depends on d.

cheers.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top