How Does Slit Spacing Affect Light Diffraction Patterns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cuti_pie75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of slit spacing on light diffraction patterns, specifically through a setup with three narrow parallel slits. The electric field at a distant point is expressed using a complex exponential, with δ defined as ka sinθ. Participants are working to prove an intensity equation that relates to the electric field's amplitude, emphasizing that intensity is proportional to the square of the electric field's magnitude. The intensity equation is derived by expanding the electric field expression and applying trigonometric identities. The verification that intensity at θ=0 equals I(0) is also confirmed within the discussion.
cuti_pie75
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Imagine that you have an opaque screen with three horizontal very narrow parallel slits in it. The second is a center-to-center distance a beneath the first, and the third is a distance 5a/2 beneath the first. (a)Write a complex exponential expression in terms of δ for the amplitude of the electric field at some point P at an elevation θ on a distant screen where δ=ka sinθ. Prove that I(θ) = I(0)/3 + 2I(0)/9 (cos δ + cos 3δ/2 + cos 5δ/2)
Verify that at θ=0, I(θ)=I(0)

I think i got the first part (a) right for the exponential expression.
E=Eo Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)]

But my problem is that i don't know how to prove this Intensity equation.

So any help would be greatly appreciated... :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


To prove the intensity equation, we first need to understand what it represents. Intensity, denoted by I, is the power per unit area of an electromagnetic wave. In this case, it represents the power per unit area of the electric field at point P on the distant screen.

We can use the expression for the electric field, E, that you have derived in part (a) to find the intensity, I. The intensity is given by the square of the magnitude of the electric field, so we have:

I = |E|^2 = E*E

Substituting the expression for E that you have derived, we get:

I = E*E = (Eo Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)]) * (Eo Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)])

Expanding the expression and using the fact that |e^ix| = 1, we get:

I = E*E = Eo^2 Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)] * Re[e^-i(α-wt) (1+e^iδ +e^-i3δ/2)]

Using the trigonometric identity cos(A+B) = cosAcosB - sinAsinB, we can simplify the expression to:

I = E*E = Eo^2 Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)] * (1 + cos δ + cos 3δ/2)

Now, we need to use the fact that the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the electric field. This means that I is directly proportional to Eo^2, so we can write:

I = E*E = Eo^2 Re[e^i(α-wt) (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)] * (1 + cos δ + cos 3δ/2)
= Eo^2 [Re[e^i(α-wt)]^2 (1+e^-iδ +e^i3δ/2)^2] * (1 + cos δ + cos 3δ/2)
= Eo^2 [1
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top