How Does Stretching a Wire Affect Its Resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Stretching a wire increases its length and affects its resistance due to changes in cross-sectional area. The resistance of a metal wire originally measuring 10 cm with a resistance of 2 ohms becomes 50 ohms when stretched to 50 cm, as calculated using the correct formula relating resistance to length and area. Some confusion arises from using an incorrect formula that suggests resistance is directly proportional to length without considering area changes. The volume of the wire remains constant during stretching, which means the cross-sectional area decreases, leading to increased resistance. Therefore, the correct resistance after stretching is indeed 50 ohms.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Resistance of a metal wire of length 10 cm is 2 ohm. If the wire is stretched uniformly to 50 cm, the resistance is-----

Homework Equations




R = (Specific resistance * length)/ Area
R1= (specific resistance * length1^2)/ Volume
similarly for R2
so R1/R2 = length1^2 / length2^2
so the resistance is 50 ohm.
Am i correct? some of my friends say that i should go for R1/R2 = length1 / length2, when applied i get the answer 10 ohm.
Which is correct?
could u help?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi logearav! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
logearav said:
R1 = specific resistance * length1^2 / volume
R2 = specific resistance * length2^2 / volume
when simplified R1/R2 = length1^2 / length2^2 which gives 50 ohm
some friends say i should use the formula R1 / R2 = length1 / length 2 which gives the answer 10 ohm
which is correct? could u help

your formula is correct

length1/length2 only applies if the cross-section area stays the same …

resistance is proportional to length, and inversely proportional to area, so altogether it's proportional to length/area, = length2/volume :smile:
 
You're correct. The volume remains constant, so the cross-sectional area must change, which will affect the resistance of the wire.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top