How Does Temperature Change Relate to Work Done by a Gas?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between temperature change and work done by a gas, emphasizing that while temperature affects the average kinetic energy of gas molecules, it does not directly equate to work done. The participants clarify that in an isothermal process, work can still occur despite no temperature change, highlighting the distinction between internal energy and external work. The conversation also touches on how energy input can increase internal energy and facilitate work done on a piston, but these two aspects are not interchangeable. Additionally, the role of radiation and photon interactions in energy transfer and their impact on gas behavior is acknowledged. Overall, the key takeaway is that temperature changes influence kinetic energy but do not directly determine the work done by a gas.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



gasquestion2_zpsdd03924b.jpg


Homework Equations



PV=nRT
the average KE of the whole gas = 3/2 nRT


The Attempt at a Solution



why can I not say that the change in temperature of 147K gives a change in average kinetic energy.

so if the energy changes by 3/2nR (147) this change in energy is equal to the work?

I know that the real answer is PV= work
(force/area) volume = force times distance
So what is wrong with my logic about equating the change in average kinetic energy of the whole gas with the work done by the gas on the piston?

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider - in an isothermal process, the temperature does not change.
By your argument there is no work done. How do you explain, then, the work in an isothermal process?

But why is the work not the change in average kinetic energy?

If I have two equal masses m, one slow one fast. The slow one has speed v and the other speed 2v.
What is the average KE of this system. Call it E1.

Now I do some work on the system so that the slow mass speeds up. Now both masses have the same speed - 2v.
What is the average kinetic energy of the system? Call it E2
What is the change in the average kinetic energy? ΔE=E2-E1

But surely the actual work done is the change in the kinetic energy of the slow mass?
What is this? Compare with the result for ΔE.
 
Imagine that the piston was glued in place so that the gas could not expand. In this case no external work would be done but the temperature of the gas would still increase. All of the electrical energy input would result in an increase of the internal energy. With the moving piston some of the energy input is converted to internal energy and the rest to external work.
 
Energy book keeping

work_zps2ae8cc16.jpg


So my understanding so far is that we are changing from state A with P(A), V(A), T(A) to state B with P(B), V(B) T(V) by putting energy into the system ΔE. We are keeping P constant. This make the ΔW calculation easier as (F/A)*V is for the work only has a change of Δs.

The energy ΔE that is added to the system can increase the average kinetic energy of the gas and some of this energy will then be used to move the piston through a distance Δs, which is the work done by the gas on the piston ΔW. So the answer to my query is that they are not equatable.

If the force F on the piston is due to the rate of change of momentum as the gas molecules collide with the piston, why then does the pressure not increase as the internal energy rises?

Is it photons leaving the wire that increase the KE of the gas molecules, and if so is the energy transfer by collision or absorption (This is a minor point really I am just interested).

Thanks for any help
 
As the temperature increases the average change of momentum per collision gets bigger but as the gas expands the average number of collisions per second gets smaller.

Radiation plays a big part in the heat transfer. An important mechanism is that photons absorbed by the surfaces increase the vibrations of the surface atoms. Some of this increased vibrational energy is transferred to the gas atoms by collision.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top