How does the addition of a dielectric affect the energy stored in a capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EmmaK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how inserting a dielectric into a parallel plate capacitor affects its energy storage while connected to a fixed voltage battery. The initial capacitance is calculated, considering the capacitor as two in parallel: one with the dielectric and one without. The total capacitance is derived as C(total) = C(0.5 + 0.5εr), indicating that the capacitance increases by a factor related to the dielectric constant. The energy stored in the capacitor is expressed as U = 0.5CV², leading to the conclusion that the energy also increases proportionally with the change in capacitance. This analysis clarifies the relationship between the dielectric's presence and the energy stored in the capacitor.
EmmaK
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plate capacitor has a capacitance C when there is a vacuum between teh plates. How does this change if the gap between the plates is half filled with a dielectric with dielectri constant \epsilonr

Calculate the change in energy stored in the capacitor if the dielectric is inserted while the capacitor is connected to a battery of fixed voltage V.

Homework Equations



C=C1+C2
C=\stackrel{\epsilon_0 A}{d}

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part, i assumed it was equivalent to 2 capacitors (one with the dielectric and one without in parallel)

C=\stackrel{\epsilon_0 0.5A}{d} =0.5C

C2= \epsilon_r*\stackrel{\epsilon_0 0.5A}{d} - 0.5\epsilon_C

C(total) = 0.5C+0.5\epsilon_rC.

Second part, not really sure how to start...

V is fixed, and U=0.5CV2.. So if C increases by (1+\epsilonr) U increases by the same factor??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EmmaK said:
For the first part, i assumed it was equivalent to 2 capacitors (one with the dielectric and one without in parallel)

Why in parallel? The battery's voltage is being applied across the 2 capacitors, not across each capacitor individually.

Second part, not really sure how to start...

V is fixed, and U=0.5CV2.. So if C increases by (1+\epsilonr) U increases by the same factor??

Yes, except C doesn't increase by (1+\epsilonr).
 
ideasrule said:
Why in parallel? The battery's voltage is being applied across the 2 capacitors, not across each capacitor individually.


Not entirely sure, just seen other examples where they said this



ideasrule said:
Yes, except C doesn't increase by (1+\epsilonr).

C(total)=C(0.5+0.5\epsilonr) so it increases by a factor of (0.5+0.5\epsilonr)?
 
Last edited:
tried it again...

U_0 =1/2 C_0 V^2 and U_1 =1/2 C_1 V^2

C_1 = 1/2 \epsilon[/tex]<sub>r</sub> so <br /> <br /> U_1 =1/2 *1/2 C_0 \epsilon[/tex]&lt;sub&gt;r&lt;/sub&gt; V^2 =1/2 \epsilon[/tex]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; *U_0 ?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top