How does the angle of the plate affect the fraction of liquid that flows up?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the angle of an inclined plate affects the fraction of liquid that flows up versus down after being struck by a horizontal water jet. It establishes that shear stress can be neglected, allowing for a simplified analysis using mass and momentum balances. The equations derived include relationships between the velocities of the liquid fractions and the angle θ, emphasizing that gravity and frictional forces are negligible. The conversation also suggests visualizing the problem by rotating the image to align the axes with the plate for clarity. Ultimately, the analysis aims to determine the relationship between the angle and the fraction of liquid that ascends the plate.
alpine_steer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal water jet produces a wide sheet of parallel-flowing liquid that strikes an inclined plate and then divides, with a fraction of the liquid flowing up the plate and the remainder flowing down the plate. The figure shows a section of the flow. All surfaces of the liquid are exposed to atmospheric pressure and both the gravity forces and frictional losses in the flow may be neglected.
Shear stress between the plate surface and the liquid may be neglected in comparison with pressure forces there and, therefore, the force between the plate and the liquid is perpendicular to the plate surface with zero component tangent to the plate surface.

With these facts, use mass and momentum balances to:

a) Determine the relation between the fraction of the liquid that travels up along the plate and the angle θ.

Homework Equations


Bernoulli's equation { u1=u2=u3}
Conservation of mass {m1=m2+m3
Conservation of momentum {um1=um2+um3

The Attempt at a Solution


Fx:
um2cos(θ)-um3cos(-θ)-um1=0
Fy:
um2sin(θ)-um3sin(-θ)=0

m2=-m3--> can not be true
 

Attachments

  • Untitled1.png
    Untitled1.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 316
Physics news on Phys.org
Fx:
um2cos(θ)-um3cos(-θ)-um1=0
Fy:
um2sin(θ)-um3sin(-θ)=0

Are you sure that ƩFx and ƩFy equal 0.
There is a plate that the jet strikes.
 
Fx:
um2cos(θ)-um3cos(-θ)-um1=Fx
[(m2+m3)cos(θ)-m1]u=Fx
[m1cos(θ)-m1]u=Fx
[cos(θ)-1]m1u=Fx
Fy:
um2sin(θ)-um3sin(-θ)=Fy
 
Gravity is neglected? So the image is looking down on the experiment?
 
Not necessarily.
Gravity can be neglected if the change in energy of the water stream due to pgh is small in comparison to other energy changes. Note also that frictional forces have been neglected also so there is no shear force on the plate.
 
Alpine Steer
To make this problem conceptually more understandable, you could rotate the picture so that the plane of the plate is either vertical or horizontal - in other words line up your axis parallel and perpendicular to the plate.

Making the axis vertical:
In that case, the water jet approaches the plate at an angle θ measured from the plate.
Since friction is neglected the plate will experience a reaction force of F only in the x-direction.
Your equations are set up in a similar manner as before but in this case there is no reaction parallel to the plate.

And since the velocity of the jet after it hits the plate is zero your momentum equationlooks much neater.

ie F = \rhoQ ( initial velocity - final velocity )
or Fx = \rhoQ( u1x - u2x ) , where u2x = 0
and u1x = Vcos(θ) or sin θ depending whether you measure the angle from the plate or the normal to the plate.
 
Back
Top