I How Does the Biot-Savart Law Apply to Angles in an Infinite Wire Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Biot-Savart Law to infinite wire calculations, particularly the measurement of angles theta1 and theta2. There is confusion regarding the textbook's assertion that theta1 approaches pi/2 as x goes to negative infinity and theta2 approaches -pi/2 as x goes to positive infinity, with some participants suggesting they have these angles reversed. The conversation highlights the importance of consistently defining the direction of angle measurements, whether clockwise or counterclockwise, to avoid negative signs in calculations. It is emphasized that the angle should be measured between the vectors r and ds to maintain clarity and yield consistent results. Ultimately, the direction of the magnetic field remains positive as long as the angle is correctly defined in relation to the vertical axis.
cosmogrl
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
In using the Biot-Savart Law for an finite wire, I am having trouble understanding the angles. I have sintheta1-sintheta2, where theta1 is measured from point P to the horizontal wire and from the vertical axis, to the left of point P. Theta 2 is measured to the right of point P.

I am ok until there. However, in going from that result to that for an infinite wire, my textbook (Serway and Jewett, Physics for scientists and engineers) says that as x goes to - infinity, theta 1 is (pi/2) and as x goes to positive infinity, theta 2 is (-pi/2). I seem to have those backwards, as theta1 being -pi/2 and theta2 being +pi/2. However, when I do it my way, I get an extra negative sign which should not be there. I am hoping someone can explain to my why theta is pi/2 to the left of point P and -pi/2 to the right of point P.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosmogrl said:
In using the Biot-Savart Law for an finite wire, I am having trouble understanding the angles. I have sintheta1-sintheta2, where theta1 is measured from point P to the horizontal wire and from the vertical axis, to the left of point P. Theta 2 is measured to the right of point P.

I am ok until there. However, in going from that result to that for an infinite wire, my textbook (Serway and Jewett, Physics for scientists and engineers) says that as x goes to - infinity, theta 1 is (pi/2) and as x goes to positive infinity, theta 2 is (-pi/2). I seem to have those backwards, as theta1 being -pi/2 and theta2 being +pi/2. However, when I do it my way, I get an extra negative sign which should not be there. I am hoping someone can explain to my why theta is pi/2 to the left of point P and -pi/2 to the right of point P.

Here is the Picture of your Book.

if you want to check you are also Correct if you take θ1, Start from the derivation at the Very beginning taking θ negative. You will get same Result.
 

Attachments

  • Biot.png
    Biot.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 626
I have a confusion. The way the diagram shows as in Diptangshu's answer theta increases in clockwise direction but conventionally anti clockwise direction is taken as positive. Can we change the convention as per our situation?
 
Kajal Sengupta said:
I have a confusion. The way the diagram shows as in Diptangshu's answer theta increases in clockwise direction but conventionally anti clockwise direction is taken as positive. Can we change the convention as per our situation?

Here the main Issue is Direction of B. And B is Out of the Page as per r x ds direction...which is considered positive.

So you can use any measurement of θ as long as B is directed out of the page. Here the Reference is Vertical axis... You can take Right or Left as positive... And derive to get Same B.
 
So, when using the equation as provided, is theta 1 always measured clockwise, but theta 2 is measured counterclockwise?
 
cosmogrl said:
So, when using the equation as provided, is theta 1 always measured clockwise, but theta 2 is measured counterclockwise?

Well if you take angle between r and ds, the limits will be π/2 to 0 and the Whole answer is multiplied by 2.
Which is the actual approach with no confusion... Because in Law of Biot Savart... dB = [μ0i/4π] [i ds sinθ / r2]... The angle θ is angle between the Vectors r and ds.

So doesn't matter what is your direction... If you start from a direction and Approach any problem properly, you Get same results.

Better to take θ angle between r, ds to avoid Confusion.
The book has taken that for Symmetry.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top