How Does the Center of Mass Move in a Two-Block System Connected by a Spring?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the motion of the center of mass in a two-block system connected by a spring. The center of mass is defined as R = 1/2(r_a + r_b), and the equations of motion are derived from the spring's displacement and the forces acting on the blocks. Participants express confusion over the velocity of the center of mass and the impact of external forces, particularly when block A loses contact with the wall. A solution using conservation of momentum is mentioned as a simpler approach to finding the answer. Ultimately, the motion of the center of mass is characterized by distinct phases based on the interaction with the wall and the spring's behavior.
Astrum
Messages
269
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Two blocks of equal mass, connected by a masslless spring of constant ##k## are on an air track. her unstreched length of the spring is ##L##. at ##t=0## block ##b## is compressed to distance from block ##a## at ##l/2## (block ##a## is pressed against a wall). Find the motion of the center of mass of the system as a function of time.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I've got most of this problem worked out, aside from the end.

Our center of mass is ##R=\frac{1}{2}(r_a + r_b )##. We have set up new labels. ##r' _a = r_a - R ## and likewise for ##r' _b##, we have ##r' _a = -r' _b ##.

The springs displacement from it's equilibrium length is given by ##r_a - r_b - L = r' _a - r_b - L##, ext we set up the equations of motion and subtract ##m\ddot{r}'_b## from ##a##.

##u = r' _a - r' _b - L \rightarrow \ddot{u} = \ddot{r}'_a - \ddot{r}'_b ## then ##m\ddot{u}+2ku=0## solving for the boundary conditions (##u(0)=\frac{L}{2}## and ##\dot{u}(0)=0##) we have

$$u(t)=\frac{L}{2}\cos\left( \sqrt{\frac{2k}{m}}t\right)$$

At this point I'm a little bit confused. We need to find velocity of ##R##, so I think we can fiddle with ##u=r'_a - r'_b - L##.

Edit: Because we can rewrite this as ##\dot{u}(t)=-\omega \frac{L}{2} \sin (\omega t)##, we can write ##\dot{r}_a - \dot{r} _b = -\omega \frac{L}{2} \sin (\omega t)##, if we multiply the entire equation by ##\frac{1}{2}##, we would have ##\dot{R} = \frac{1}{2}(\dot{r}_a - \dot{r} _b ) = -\omega \frac{L}{4} \sin (\omega t)##? The only thing that's really weird is that this is negative, which can't be right.

Edit: Edit: Forget the top edit, I didn't realize that ##R = \frac{1}{2}(r_a + r_b )##Edit:Edit:Edit: I tried another method. Because ##\cdot{r}' _a - \dot{r}'_b = \dot{u}(t)## and ##\cdot{r}' _a = -\dot{r}'_b ##,this implies that ##\dot{r}'_a = -\omega \frac{L}{4} \sin (\omega t)## and ##\dot{r}'_b = \omega \frac{L}{4} \sin (\omega t)##. Now that we have two expressions, we can plug these into ##\dot{R} = \frac{1}{2}(\dot{r}'_a + \dot{r}'_b ) = 0## This result also seems counterintuitive The more I try, the more confused I become
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would split the problem into two phases. In the first phase, block A is against the wall and there is a force from the wall onto A. Later on, the system will move away from the wall, never to return. Find out when that happens.
 
haruspex said:
I would split the problem into two phases. In the first phase, block A is against the wall and there is a force from the wall onto A. Later on, the system will move away from the wall, never to return. Find out when that happens.

I was thinking that a valuable piece of information might be that the force on A and B is ##k\frac{L}{2}##, but I can't figure out how to use it. These forces from the spring oppose each other.

I can't understand why we should need to do anymore work on this, we have the EoM, it seems to me that it's just a matter of subbing in the right values.

With ##\ddot{u}(t)##, we have information on what all the other variables can be.

What I can think of physically, is the spring will push block B out past it's rest length, at which point A will have a force pulling it away from the wall.

##\dot{u}(t) = \dot{r}' _a - \dot{r}'_b## and ##\dot{r}' _a = -\dot{r}'_b## must give us the velocities of each, it's just a matter of solving them. I tried this method in my last edit, and it didn't seem to work.

Do you see what I'm saying? You may very well have suggested the correct way to look at this problem, but I'm having a difficult time seeing why my approach won't work.
 
Astrum said:
I was thinking that a valuable piece of information might be that the force on A and B is ##k\frac{L}{2}##, but I can't figure out how to use it. These forces from the spring oppose each other.

I can't understand why we should need to do anymore work on this, we have the EoM, it seems to me that it's just a matter of subbing in the right values.

With ##\ddot{u}(t)##, we have information on what all the other variables can be.

What I can think of physically, is the spring will push block B out past it's rest length, at which point A will have a force pulling it away from the wall.

##\dot{u}(t) = \dot{r}' _a - \dot{r}'_b## and ##\dot{r}' _a = -\dot{r}'_b## must give us the velocities of each, it's just a matter of solving them. I tried this method in my last edit, and it didn't seem to work.

Do you see what I'm saying? You may very well have suggested the correct way to look at this problem, but I'm having a difficult time seeing why my approach won't work.
I confess I've not tried to follow your working so far, but my point is that the circumstances will undergo a distinct change when block A loses contact with the wall. Up until that point, it will be as though the spring were fixed to the wall, and block A might as well not exist. After that point, there is no external force on the system. I don't see anywhere that you've modeled that, which makes me doubt your approach.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
I confess I've not tried to follow your working so far, but my point is that the circumstances will undergo a distinct change when block A loses contact with the wall. Up until that point, it will be as though the spring were fixed to the wall, and block A might as well not exist. After that point, there is no external force on the system. I don't see anywhere that you've modeled that, which makes me doubt your approach.

I got the answer through conservation of momentum, but I think it was a little bit of an underhanded tactic. But it's all good, thanks for the help, you made me realize I could "cheat". I could have gotten an answer with 1/4 the work involved.
 
Astrum said:
I got the answer through conservation of momentum, but I think it was a little bit of an underhanded tactic. But it's all good, thanks for the help, you made me realize I could "cheat". I could have gotten an answer with 1/4 the work involved.
OK, that's good.
Fwiw, it looks to me that the answer must be like
(L/2)(1-cos(γt)/2) for t < π/(2γ)
L/2 + v(t-π/(2γ)) for larger t.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top