How Does the Density of States Apply to Electrons in Bands?

Vanush
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
"the density of states (DOS) of a system describes the number of states at each energy level that are available to be occupied. "

But I thought there can't be more than 1 electron in a state? How does DoS have any meaning when dealing with eleectrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My understanding is as follows:

The density of states, g(E), tells you the number of possible states at each energy. Since these states are degenerate, you can have one electron in different states at the same energy.

The expected number of electrons in a given energy state, f(E), is calculated using Fermi-Dirac statistics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi-Dirac_statistics
This can be no more than 1 because of the Pauli exclusion principle.

So then the total number of electrons at a given energy would be f(E)g(E).
 
nicksauce said:
My understanding is as follows:

The density of states, g(E), tells you the number of possible states at each energy. Since these states are degenerate, you can have one electron in different states at the same energy.

More precisely, g(E) = (# of states between E and E+dE) / (dE)

In a finite system, it is always a series of delta functions.

As the system size gets bigger so that we can assume that it is in the thermodynamic limit, we smooth out the delta functions to get a continuous version of g(E).
 
Why do electron states split into bands in solids if states exist for electrons that have the same energy level
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top