How does the electrostatic potential at point B compare to point A?

LonghornDude8
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A test charge +q is brought to a point A a distance r from the center of a sphere having a net charge +Q. Next, a test charge +2q is brought to a point B a distance 2r from the center of the sphere.
Compared with the electrostatic potential at A, the electrostatic potential at B is
A. smaller
B. the same
C. greater


Homework Equations


V=kq/r
U=kq1q2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Because you are solving for electric potential I assume that you forget about the charge of the test charges and therefore you would get A. smaller. But if you use the charge of the test charges, you get b. the same. I'm just looking for someone to agree or disagree with me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LonghornDude8 said:
Because you are solving for electric potential I assume that you forget about the charge of the test charges and therefore you would get A. smaller.
I agree.
But if you use the charge of the test charges, you get b. the same. I'm just looking for someone to agree or disagree with me
I disagree. As you said, the electric potential set up by the charged sphere is the same at all points in space regardless of how much additional charge you bring in.
 
Ya, what I said first was right. I just got a little confused because they gave extra info... I hate when that happens.

"I know one thing - that I know no thing." - lol, paradox
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top