How Does the Metric Tensor Relate to a General Tensor B in Tensor Calculations?

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand what kind of relation the metric can have with a general tensor B.

d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{ab}}=d{{s}^{2}}
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{ab}}}{d{{s}^{2}}}=1
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{ab}}}{d{{s}^{2}}}=\frac{1}{D}g_{a}^{a}
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{db}}g_{a}^{d}}{d{{s}^{2}}}=\frac{1}{D}g_{d}^{a}g_{a}^{d}
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{db}}g_{a}^{d}}{d{{s}^{2}}}A_{m}^{n}=<br /> \frac{1}{D}g_{d}^{a}g_{a}^{d}A_{m}^{n}
Define: B_{am}^{dn}=g_{a}^{d}A_{m}^{n}
substitute in
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{db}}}{d{{s}^{2}}}B_{am}^{dn}=\frac{1}{D}g_{d}^{a}B_{am}^{dn}
\frac{d{{x}^{a}}d{{x}^{b}}{{g}_{db}}}{d{{s}^{2}}}B_{am}^{dn}=\frac{1}{D}B_{am}^{an}

It all looks Ok to me. Does all of the following look reasonable, or is there a problem somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the above looks reasonable. It shows that the metric has a relationship with a general tensor B, such that the metric can be used to calculate the rate of change of the tensor B with respect to distance. Specifically, it shows that the rate of change is equal to the tensor divided by the determinant of the metric.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top