How Does the One-Dimensional Wave Equation Model Tensile Forces in a String?

mSSM
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Reading the very first chapter of Weinberger's First Course in PDEs, I stumbled over the derivation of the tensile force in the horizontal direction. The question was posted already in this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/one-dimensional-wave-equation.531397/

And the first answer provides the following solution:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

Homework Equations


What leads to the above equation? Why write the the denominator in this form? Isn't it just equal to one?

The Attempt at a Solution


The slope of the string at the point ##s##is obviously given by ##\tan\theta = \frac{\partial y}{\partial x} = \left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right) \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^{-1}##, which, if I understand that correctly, simply translates to ##\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta} =\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right) \left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial x}\right)##. Is that part correct so far?

Now, this leads me directly to:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t) \frac{\sin\theta}{\tan\theta} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial y}{\partial s} \cdot \frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
\text{.}
$$

Where exactly is the above-mentioned denominator coming from?

I also notice that
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta =T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\sqrt{\left(\partial x\right)^2+\left( \partial y\right)^2}}
\text{,}
$$
where multiplication by ##\partial s## in the numerator and denominator leads to:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

But from the definition of cosine and sine we have:
$$
\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2 = \cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta =1
\text{,}
$$
and thus
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
\text{.}
$$

So what's the point of writing the expression in the way the author is doing in the book? I am sure there is something I am missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mSSM said:

Homework Statement



Reading the very first chapter of Weinberger's First Course in PDEs, I stumbled over the derivation of the tensile force in the horizontal direction. The question was posted already in this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/one-dimensional-wave-equation.531397/

And the first answer provides the following solution:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

Homework Equations


What leads to the above equation? Why write the the denominator in this form? Isn't it just equal to one?

No, it's not 1 because the string stretches. As described in the original source, s for a point on the string is the x-coordinate that that point would have had if the string were unstretched, straight, and parallel to the x-axis.

If you have a section of string running from s=s_1 to s=s_2, then the unstretched length of that section would be

L = |s_2 - s_1| = \delta s

The stretched length would be given by:
L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}^2 + \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}^2} \delta s

In general, L' > L.
 
stevendaryl said:
No, it's not 1 because the string stretches. As described in the original source, s for a point on the string is the x-coordinate that that point would have had if the string were unstretched, straight, and parallel to the x-axis.

If you have a section of string running from s=s_1 to s=s_2, then the unstretched length of that section would be

L = |s_2 - s_1| = \delta s

The stretched length would be given by:
L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}^2 + \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}^2} \delta s

In general, L' > L.

Thank you for your reply.

So if ##L'## is the stretched length as described by you, then the needed equation above follows immediately. I am, however, still not sure about that ##L'##. Can you explain where your last equation comes from (as shown below; I have added parenthesis where I thought you wanted them)?
$$
L' = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2} \delta s
$$

Are ##\delta x^2## and ##\delta y^2## referring to the non-equilibrium, stretched state of the string? In other words, let ##\delta x'## and ##\delta s'## refer to the stretched state of the string; then:
$$
\cos \theta = \frac{\delta x'}{\delta s'}
$$

Now writing for ##\delta s'##
$$
\delta s' = \sqrt{\left(\delta x' \right)^2 + \left(\delta y' \right)^2} \frac{\delta s}{\delta s} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x'}{\partial s} \right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial y'}{\partial s} \right)^2} \delta s
$$

Finally, renaming ##x' \rightarrow x## and ##y' \rightarrow y## I recover your equation.

So is that all there is? Is it essentially just multiplying the RHS by ##\frac{\delta s}{\delta s}##, effectively turning the equation into a differential?

I believe I was most confused about the notation. :)
 
You can think of it this way: Take the unstretched string and imagine holding it straight and drawing a black mark each millimeter. Then s counts which mark you're talking about. x and y are not me If you have a piece of stretched string, then s_1 is the mark on one end, and s_2 is the mark on the other end. x_1 is the x-position of the first end, x_2 is the x-position of the other end. y_1 and y_2 are the y-positions of the two ends.

string.jpg

In the above figures, Figure 1 shows an unstretched piece of string, colored red. The unstretched length is L = 8 mm. s runs from s_1 = 0 to s_2 = 8.Now we stretch the piece of string, so that now the string runs from (x=0, y=4) to (x=12, y=-4), as shown in Figure 2. \delta x = 12, \delta y = -8. That's the change in x and y from one end of the string to the other. The length of the string is now L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{12^2 + 8^2} = 14.42 mm.

An alternative way to calculate the same L' is to use L' = \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{ds})^2 + (\frac{dy}{ds})^2} \delta s.

\frac{dx}{ds} = \frac{12}{8} = 1.5
\frac{dy}{ds} = 1
\sqrt{(\frac{dx}{ds})^2 + (\frac{dy}{ds})^2} = 1.802
L' = 1.802* 8 mm = 14.42 mm<br /> <br /> Note: s is defined so that \delta s doesn't change when you stretch it, but L' does.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top