How Does the Time Evolution of Expectation Shape Scientific Understanding?

OGrowli
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about how quantum mechanical expectation values evolve with time? If so, then it evolves according to the differential equation

\frac{d}{dt}<{\psi}|O|{\psi}> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<{\psi}|[H,O]|{\psi}> + <{\psi}|\frac{{\partial}O}{{\partial}t}|{\psi}>

With O being a Hermitian operator.
 
Last edited:
planck42 said:
Are you asking about how quantum mechanical expectation values evolve with time? If so, then it evolves according to the differential equation

\frac{d}{dt}<{\psi}|O|{\psi}> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<{\psi}|[H,O]|{\psi}> + <{\psi}|\frac{{\partial}O}{{\partial}t}|{\psi}>

With O being a Hermitian operator.

i don't know what happened to my original post, but I am having an issue with the following problem:

Show that:

\frac{d}{dt}<x^2> =\frac{1}{m}(< xp_x> +<p_xx>)

for a three dimensional wave packet.

relevant equations:

Ehrenfest Theorem:(1)
i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}&lt;O&gt;=&lt;[O,H]&gt;+i\hbar&lt;\frac{\partial }{\partial t}O&gt;

where O is an operator
(2)
\frac{d}{dt}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*O\psi

I tried using both ways illustrated above and I arrived at the same answer:

\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\bigtriangledown ^2(x^2\psi)-x^2\bigtriangledown ^2\psi]

=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\frac{\partial }{\partial x}<br /> (x^2\psi&#039;+2x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi]

=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[<br /> 2\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+(x^2-x^2)\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi]

=\frac{1}{m}\int_{V}d^3r[\psi ^*(-i\hbar)\psi+\psi^*x(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})\psi+\psi^*(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})x\psi]

=\frac{1}{m}(&lt;xp_x&gt;+&lt;p_xx&gt;)-\frac{i\hbar}{m}

Am I doing anything wrong? Where does the extra term come from, and does it mean anything?
 
nvm, I got it:

<br /> =\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\frac{\partial }{\partial x}<br /> (x^2\psi&#039;+2x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi]<br />

=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+2\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi]

=\frac{1}{m}\int_{V}d^3r[\psi^*x(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})\psi+\psi^*(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})x\psi]

=\frac{1}{m}(&lt;xp_x&gt;+&lt;p_xx&gt;)

I went wrong thinking I could just rearrange the derivatives.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top