How Does Toughness Compare Between Martensite and Carbon Steel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter temaire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Steel
AI Thread Summary
Martensite is known for its strength but lacks ductility, resulting in a steep stress-strain curve with a small plastic region before failure. In contrast, carbon steel, while not as strong, offers greater ductility, leading to a larger plastic region and higher toughness. The toughness of a material is defined by the area under its stress-strain curve, indicating the energy it can absorb before failure. Therefore, carbon steel is generally tougher than martensite due to its ability to deform more before breaking. Understanding these properties is crucial for applications where materials are subjected to high tensile stresses.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/2223/mateb.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming that the guitar string is made of martensite and the metal chain link is made of carbon steel, I think that the metal chain link would have a higher toughness. My reasoning behind this is since martensite is very strong but not ductile, then the elastic region of its stress-strain curve would be steep and the plastic region would be very small before the string fails. On the other hand, the metal chain link is not as strong as the string but is a bit more ductile. The elastic region of its stress-strain curve would not be as steep, and the plastic region would last longer before failure. Therefore, the area under the stress-strain curve of the metal chain link would be greater than the area under the stress-strain curve of the string, as seen in the figure below.

[PLAIN]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/3831/mate2.png

Also, looking at it from a design point of view, a metal chain link is obviously designed to withstand high tensile stresses, whereas a guitar string is only designed to withstand tensile stresses in the elastic region.

Is my understanding of the problem correct? Am I wrong with my choice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire: Your answer is correct. By the way, please do not post wide images directly to the forum page. Just post a text link to wide images.
 
temaire said:
...then the elastic region of its stress-strain curve would be steep and...
... The elastic region of its stress-strain curve would not be as steep...

This is not correct. The "steepness" or slope (Young's Modulus) of the elastic region would be approximately identical for the two steels.
 
temaire said:
Also, looking at it from a design point of view, a metal chain link is obviously designed to withstand high tensile stresses, whereas a guitar string is only designed to withstand tensile stresses in the elastic region.

Is my understanding of the problem correct? Am I wrong with my choice?
The key in the problem is found in the problem statement, "Basically, toughness is the amount of energy a material can withstand before it fails." The energy is measured by the area under the stress-strain curve, which gives the strain-energy density. As strength of a material increases (and total elongation decreases), the material is less tough, i.e., it absorbs less energy before failure.

Ductility is associated with the ability of a material to deform before failure. However, most metals are designed to operated well within the elastic region. Usually, permanent or plastic deformation is undesirable.
 
Back
Top