How Does Waste Heat from Nuclear Plants Affect River Temperatures?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum temperature increase in the Connecticut River due to waste heat from a nuclear power plant that releases 1.00x10^11 kJ/day. Participants are trying to apply the specific heat equation but are struggling with the conversion of energy and mass rates. The potential impact of constructing four additional nuclear power plants on river temperatures and ecological health is also raised. Concerns about the ecological consequences of increased temperatures are highlighted. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate calculations to assess the environmental implications of nuclear waste heat.
chamrick
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A nuclear power plant on the Connecticut River produces 2.00x10^2 megawatts of power, but also releases 1.00x10^11 kJ/day of waste heat into the river. assume that the average rate of flow of the river is 9.00x10^4 kg/s. a. What is the maximum temperature increase in the river water that could be caused by the plants cooling system? b. The construction of four additional nuclear power plants along the river has been proposed. What is the total increase in the temperature of the river that could result if the plants are built? Could this change cause serious damage to the ecological structure of the river?

Homework Equations



Not a clue, this is where the help is needed. deltaTxmxC=Q

The Attempt at a Solution



Converted kJ to regular joules, used the equation for specific heat, but I know I'm missing steps in the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the only equation my teacher has provided me with, should i possibly be using a different equation.
 
The equation you posted is a start, but you'll need to adjust it a bit since you don't have Q or m (kJ and kg) but a rate of energy transfer and a rate of mass transfer (kJ/day and kg/s)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top