How Effective Are Human-Powered Chargers for Everyday Use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charger Human
AI Thread Summary
Human-powered chargers can vary significantly in design and efficiency, with examples like bike-powered chargers being common. Understanding the efficiency equation is crucial, as it defines the relationship between input power (P_in) and stored power (P_stored). A system with 0% efficiency would require infinite energy to store any finite amount, while 100% efficiency means that the energy supplied equals the energy stored. The discussion emphasizes the importance of deriving the efficiency equation to analyze the effectiveness of these chargers. Overall, human-powered chargers can be practical, but their efficiency is a critical factor in their everyday usability.
azler
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


34htj5s.jpg


Can some one please help me out on this, i can't seem to get my head around it.

Regards,
Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tell me what you've done so far.
 
do you know the equation for efficiency? if not, do you think you can derive it? if a system were 0 percent efficient(0.00), you'd need to supply infinite energy to reach any finite stored energy. If the system were 100% efficient (1.00), you'd need to supply Z joules to store Z joules. Can you think of a relationship between P_in and P_stored that relies on the 0 to 1.00 representation of efficiency that would produce the end behavior we just explored?
 
Hi Sorry about the late reply i have been away.
I have not managed to do any thing on this question it has stumped me from he start.
It says a human power charger is used but not what charger so i am assuming i can make on up? for instance a bike powered charger?
Any info to get me started would help me a lot.
Regards,
Rob
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top