How Far Does a Muon Travel Before Decaying?

ian2012
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A pi+, produced by a cosmic ray, has an energy of 280MeV in the laboratory frame S. It undergoes a decay: pi+ ---> muon+ & muon-neutrino. The muon produced continues to travel along the same direction as the pi+ and has a mean lifetime of 2.2mirco seconds in the muon's rest frame (S''). Calculate the expected distance it would have traveled in the laboratory frame S before decaying.

Homework Equations



In the rest frame of the pion (S'):
E^{'}_{\mu}=\frac{(m^{2}_{\pi}+m^{2}_{\mu})c^{2}}{2m_{\pi}}
P^{'}_{\mu}=\frac{(m^{2}_{\pi}-m^{2}_{\mu})c}{2m_{\pi}}
and other relativistic relations and Lorentz Transforms

m_{\pi}=139.6\frac{MeV}{c^{2}}, m_{\mu}=105.7\frac{MeV}{c^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attempted the problem, I don't know if i am correct.
The obvious thing to do is find the mean lifetime in the frame S' and the distance in S' in order to solve the equation:
x_{\mu}=\gamma(x^{'}_{\mu}+vt^{'}_{\mu})

To find t' I have used the fact that time dilates in moving frames therefore t' = gamma x t'' (2.2 mircoseconds)
I then used the relativistic momentum equation to find the velocity of muon in the pion rest frame S': v' = 0.28177/gamma
Then i used LT to find the distance traveled in the pion frame = gamma x v x t'' = 0.28177 x t''.
Then I used the energy of the pion in the lab frame to find the velocity of the pion in the lab frame using the relativistic energy equation and the momentum equation to give = 1.739/gamma.
Subbing these into the above equation I got the expected distance = gamma x 4.45x10^-6 metres.
Is this correct? Is the gamma supposed to be there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ian2012 said:
I have attempted the problem, I don't know if i am correct.
The obvious thing to do is find the mean lifetime in the frame S' and the distance in S' in order to solve the equation:
x_{\mu}=\gamma(x^{'}_{\mu}+vt^{'}_{\mu})

To find t', I have used the fact that time dilates in moving frames; therefore, t' = gamma x t'' (2.2 microseconds). I then used the relativistic momentum equation to find the velocity of muon in the pion rest frame S': v' = 0.28177/gamma. Then i used LT to find the distance traveled in the pion frame = gamma x v x t'' = 0.28177 x t''.
Looks okay so far.

Then I used the energy of the pion in the lab frame to find the velocity of the pion in the lab frame using the relativistic energy equation and the momentum equation to give = 1.739/gamma.
So just to be clear: this gamma is for the pion moving relative to S, not the gamma above.

Subbing these into the above equation I got the expected distance = gamma x 4.45x10^-6 metres.
Is this correct? Is the gamma supposed to be there?
I don't follow what you did here. Could you provide more detail, like exactly what quantities you plugged into what equations?

The answer isn't right. You left out a factor of c, for one thing. Even after multiplying your answer by c, it's still off. You should get 1565 meters.
 
Sorry, but I have been away for a while. Looking back at this question, I've realized what mistakes I've made:
1. I didn't realize gamma can be calculated using Energy and Mass (very trivial).
2. I didn't realize there are two different gamma's, since there are three different frames.
3. I also missed out the speed of light in the final answer, as you pointed out.

The final answer I get is: 1551 metres with minimal rounding of answers. (x' = 179m, v[lab/pion] = 0.867c, t' = 2.29 microseconds). This is a little bit off your 1565 metres.
 
You miscalculated x'. It should be 186 m.
 
Oh right yeah of course. I divided by an extra gamma term. Yeah i get x' = 186m and x = 1.56km with rounding. Thanks vela
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top