How far has the spring been compressed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compressed Spring
AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 9.0 kg slides down a frictionless incline and compresses a spring with a spring constant of 3.50 x 10^4 N/m after traveling 5.00 m. The gravitational force acting on the block is calculated using the incline angle of 29°, resulting in a force of 42.76 N. The energy conservation principle indicates that the energy lost by the block equals the energy stored in the spring. The equation used to find the spring compression is 1/2 kx^2 = fx(5-x), but the initial attempt yielded an incorrect compression value of x = 5.11 m. Proper application of energy conservation will lead to the correct compression distance of the spring.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
A block of mass 9.0 kg slides from rest down a frictionless incline and is stopped by a strong spring with spring constant 3.50 x 10^4 The block slides 5.00 m from the point of release to the point where it comes to rest against the spring. When the block comes to rest, how far has the spring been compressed?

My attempt:
9(9.8)sin29=42.76N

Since during the 5m of motion, energy loss is going to be equal to energy gain,
i should be able to apply this equation
1/2kx^2=fxs
x= length of movement that the spring isn't compressed during.
1/2(3.5x10^4)(5-x)^2=42.76x
this doesn't yield the correct answer as x=5.11
what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks just like:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=309014
that you posted yesterday without a spring constant?

Since you are using sin29, I'm guessing that the incline is 29°.

So to solve either of these problems, you know the total energy in the system, from gravitational potential energy.

When it stops then you know how much energy must be in the spring.

From that you can readily figure the compression of the spring.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top