How Far Will a Sliding Cylinder Travel Before It Rolls Without Sliding?

AI Thread Summary
A full cylinder sliding on a plane with a friction coefficient µ is analyzed to determine the distance it travels before rolling without sliding. The problem involves setting up a coordinate frame and applying Newton's second law (Force = ma) and the rotational equivalent (Torque = I * w_dot). By establishing the normal force and friction force in terms of known parameters, the equations of motion for both linear position x(t) and angular velocity w(t) can be derived. The key condition for transitioning to pure rolling is the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity, which must be satisfied to find the time t when rolling begins. Solving these equations provides the distance the cylinder travels before it starts rolling without sliding.
giladbr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A full cylinder is placed on a straight plane with a friction coefficient µ (static=dinamic). The cylinder is hit in the middle and begins sliding without rolling in a linear velocity V0. The acceleration of gravity is g.

Calculate the distance the cylinder will pass until it starts rolling without sliding.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As with all problems like this, set up a coordinate frame, draw in the force vectors, then apply Force = ma and Torque = I * (w_dot).

This gives you three scalar equations. If you put the coordinate frame so that y is normal to the ramp and x is down the ramp, then y_double_dot is zero and you only have to deal with x_double_dot, and w_dot.

Setting y_double_dot = 0 gives you the normal force and thus the friction force in terms of parameters you know (mass, theta, g, u). You know all the initial conditions, so you can integrate to find both x(t) and w(t).

If only we knew what t was, we would be done. You would plug t into x and solve. You still have one condition you haven't used yet. We want the time t when pure rolling occurs. What is the relation between w and x_dot for pure rolling? Plug in w and x_dot that you found into this condition and solve for t when rolling occurs.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top