How Fast Can a Carousel Spin Safely for Toddlers?

Alcape
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a designer finds through research of accident reports at a hospital that children
under 5 can usually survive a fall of 1 m without serious injury, what is the
maximum safe turning speed for a carousel to be used by children of this age?


Homework Equations


No Idea


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Alcape! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I'm as confused as you are :redface:

most of the question seems to be missing.

The carousel can be dangerous either because the centripetal acceleration is too much for the brain, or because the child might fall off and hit something.

But, for both, you need to know the radius (and you don't). :confused:
 
Thanks For that tiny-tim I thought their may have been a formula I didn't know of. I appreciate your prompt reply. Thanks again.
 
Thanks for replying I now have an answer If you use the formula v = √(2gs)
where v is the velocity g is the acceleration due to gravity and s is the distance fallen then it comes out to be 4.429m/s...
 
Hi Alcape! :smile:
Alcape said:
Thanks for replying I now have an answer If you use the formula v = √(2gs)
where v is the velocity g is the acceleration due to gravity and s is the distance fallen then it comes out to be 4.429m/s...

Yes, that's a possible answer …

but I suspect when the question says "turning speed", it means angular speed (for which you'd need to know the radius). :redface:

(and if that is the right answer, why is the question so complicated … why is it about a carousel? :confused:)
 
I don't know why it's so complicated I didn't make it
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top