How Fast Do Spaceships Appear to Each Other at 0.99c Relative Speed?

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
An observer sees two spaceships flying apart with speed 0.99c, what is the speed of one spaceship as viewed by the other? the answer is: 0.99995c.

well we have the equation of relative velocity:
\frac{v_1+v_2}{1+\frac{v_1v_2}{c^2}}=0.99c
now i think from the question that i need to find v1+v2 here, cause compared to spaceship 1, spaceship two is moving with speed -(v1+v2) and spaceship 1 compared to two is moving with speed v1+v2.

but how to find it, perhaps i need some algebraic manipulation which i don't see how do, or my above equations are flawed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand the situation correctly, you're seeing two spaceships moving exactly away from you with 0,99 c in opposite directions. Now you have to use the last equation on the following page: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html with ux=0.99c and vx=-.99c o yield for the relative velocity (as viewed by either of the two spaceships:

w = \frac{|ux - vx| }{ 1 - ux vx/c^2}=\frac{2*0.99}{1-0.99^2}=0.99995
 
it should be 1+0.99^2 in the denominator.
thanks, i didn't undersatnd the situation, i thought that the observer measures the relative speed between them, and that speed is 0.99c.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top