How High Must Charged Particles Be for Radio Wave Interference?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum height of a layer of charged particles in the atmosphere that causes destructive interference for radio waves of frequency 8.00 x 10^2 kHz, received 12 km from the transmitter. The wavelength has been determined to be 375 m, but the user is uncertain about the next steps to find the height. Participants suggest using the equation x/L = lambda/d to assist in solving the problem. The expected answer for the height is between 1 and 2. Clarification and guidance on the application of the relevant equations are sought to resolve the issue.
patriots1049
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An aircraft causes a horizontal layer of charged particles to be formed in the atmosphere. Radio waves are relected without phase from this layer. Radio waves of frequency 8.00 x 10^2 kHz are received at a location 12 km from the transmitter. What is the minimum height of the layer of particles if radio reception fades due to destructive interference between the direct beam and the reflected beam?


Homework Equations



lamba = v/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I have found a wavelength of 375 m. Now I'm not sure what to do from here. The answer is supposed to be between 1 and 2. Can someone help me get past this road block?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
patriots1049 said:

Homework Statement


An aircraft causes a horizontal layer of charged particles to be formed in the atmosphere. Radio waves are relected without phase from this layer. Radio waves of frequency 8.00 x 10^2 kHz are recerved at a location 12 km from the transmitter. What is the minimum height of the layer of particles if radio reception fades due to destructive interference between the direct beam and the reflected beam?


Homework Equations



lamba = v/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I have found a wavelength of 375 m. Now I'm not sure what to do from here. The answer is supposed to be between 1 and 2. Can someone help me get past this road block?

Ah yes, quite a familiar problem. The workings should not be too hard. I believe that the equation is x/L=lambda/d, if I'm not mistaken, unless that is a predefined equation designated by your instructor specifically for this problem...
 
Can someone assist me in solving this problem?
 
I wish I could.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top