How high up on a ladder can he go without the ladder slipping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rachie9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slipping
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how high a person can climb a 5m ladder leaning against a wall without it slipping. The ladder's angle with the ground is 60 degrees, and static friction is limited to 0.4 mg, where mg represents the person's weight. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding forces and torques, suggesting the use of a free body diagram to identify all forces acting on the ladder. Key steps include determining forces, choosing a pivot point for torque calculations, and ensuring both net force and net torque equations equal zero. The conversation highlights the need for a systematic approach to solving statics problems involving ladders.
rachie9
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The ladder is 5m leaning on a wall, and it is 2.5 m away from the bottom of the wall, so the angle between the ground and the ladder is 60 degrees. The contact interaction between the ladder and the ground has a static friction force of no more than .4 mg, and mg is the weight of the person on the ladder. How high can he climb w/o the ladder slipping?



The relevant equations are acceleration = 0 and torque = 0 because the ladder isn't moving.



I know that the static friction and normal force from the wall on the ladder must equal 0, and that the normal force from the ground plus the force of gravity must equal 0. Since the torque is 0, I think the total force x length of ladder x cos 60 must equal 0, but I'm not sure how to break up the individual forces and fit them into this equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The most important point to realize here is that the net torque on the ladder must be zero, as you said.

To start, try taking the torques about the upper end of the ladder.
 
rachie9 said:
I think the total force x length of ladder x cos 60 must equal 0

Note: This statement is definitely incorrect -- it doesn't say net torque is zero. In fact, I don't think it is mathematically identified with anything physical about the problem.

rachie9 said:
but I'm not sure how to break up the individual forces and fit them into this equation.

Heres an outline of what you need to do in ANY statics problems (even when something like a distance is unknown, and variables have to be carried along):

1) Find all the bits of force and locate them along the length of the object with an orientation. some of these are related to gravitational force, some of them are related to other forces (like you say: friction, normal forces).
i.e. DRAW A FREE BODY DIAGRAM of the ladder!

2) Make lists of your forces in some coordinate system that has perpendicular axes: You can list either of:
a) Upwards forces vs. downwards forces
b) Forces parallel to the ladder versus forces perpendicular to the ladder
Note: you may have to break forces into components and use these components in your chosen listing.

You will use the above information to make a net force equals zero equation.

3) Chose a pivot point for referencing torques an identify the forces that cause torques when the system is oriented from the pivot.
edited to add: Hootenanny gives a wise choice for this pivot... why is the choice smart?

4) Find the components of those forces that are parallel to and perpendicular to the ladder.

5) Find all the moments of inertia/torques using ONLY the components of forces perpendicular to the length of the ladder -- using your CHOSEN pivot.
(I make separate lists of clockwise torques and counterclockwise torques).

You will use the step 3-5 information to make a net torque equals zero equation.

Can you start to fill in these steps?
 
Thanks for your help.

I'm not sure how many components are in the net torque equation. I know there is a torque from the force of gravity, is there one for all the normal forces (acting on the ladder from the person, from the wall, and from the ground) as well? What about from friction?

Once I have my net torque = 0, how do I relate this to my net force = 0 equation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top