How High Was the Girl When She Released the Rope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mesmer17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Rope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height from which a girl releases a rope while swinging above a swimming hole. The initial velocity is given as 2.05 m/s at a 35° angle, and she is in flight for 1.60 seconds. A participant suggests using the equation H = -g/2 t² + v₀ sin(θ) t + y₀ to find the initial height (y₀) above the water, emphasizing that when she hits the water, H equals zero. The original poster's approach to finding vertical velocity (Vy) was incorrect due to not properly incorporating the flight time. Correcting these calculations will yield the accurate height above the water.
Mesmer17
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Q)On a hot summer day a young girl swings on a rope above the local swimming hole (Figure 4-20). When she let's go of the rope her initial velocity is 2.05 m/s at an angle of 35.0° above the horizontal. If she is in flight for 1.60 s, how high above the water was she when she let go of the rope?

TO GET THE ANSWER.. first I found Vo by using 2.05(sin35) which is 1.17.. then I got the Vy by using -G(t) which is -9.80(1.60) which I got 15.68 for.. using these values I plugged them into the equation: H=Vy^2-Voy^2/2Ay and I got 12.5 for an answer that is wrong.. can anyone tell me where I went wrong? THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinematics

Use the equation Vy= Voy + at to find Vy. You only multiplied a by t, so your Vy term was incorrect. Good luck
 
Since you are told that "she is in flight for 1.60 s", don't you think it would be a good idea to use that information?

The simplest way to do this problem is to note that the height at time t is H= -g/2 t2+ v0 sin(theta) t+ y0 where H is the height above the water and y0 is the initial height above the water (which is what you are asked for).

When she hits the water, H= 0 so plug in the information you are given and solve -g/2 t2+ vo sin(theta)+ y0= 0 for y0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top