How Is Acceleration Calculated in a Space Shuttle Launch?

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration during a Space Shuttle launch is calculated using the formula F=ma, where the total force is the sum of the thrust from all engines. The shuttle has three main engines producing 1.7 MN each and two booster rockets producing 23 MN each, achieving maximum thrust after 0.5 seconds. The mass of the shuttle is approximately 2.0 x 10^6 kg. To find acceleration, the total force is divided by the mass, confirming that force is additive. Understanding these calculations is essential for analyzing the shuttle's launch dynamics.
confusedmia
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
[Here's the exact question!] A space shuttle is fully fueled and stand on a launching pad. At launch there are 5 separate engines pushing the shuttle skyward, 3 main engines of 1.7MN thrust each, plus 2 booster rockets each producing 23MN of thrust. Max thrust T is achieved after 0.5sec. Calculate the acceleration of the shuttle 0.5sec after ignition, taking the mass of the shuttle to be 2.0^10(to the power of)6 kg at this instance.
Relevant Equations
Fnet=ma, w=mg
Sorry there, relatively new to this topic. Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration. So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2), while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably all they mean is that the rockets take 0.5s to get up to maximum thrust.
 
  • Like
Likes confusedmia
confusedmia said:
Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration.
Yes.
So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2)
Yes, force is additive. If you have multiple forces, the effect of them all put together is the [vector] sum of the individual forces. F=ma is often written as ##\Sigma F=ma## to reflect this.

However, there is a force that you have not accounted for.
while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
The kilogram is already a unit of mass.
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
Yes

Note that one would normally write two million as 2.0E+6, as 2.0x106, 2.0x10^6 or even ##2.0\times 10^6##
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
confusedmia said:
Problem Statement: [Here's the exact question!] A space shuttle is fully fueled and stand on a launching pad. At launch there are 5 separate engines pushing the shuttle skyward, 3 main engines of 1.7MN thrust each, plus 2 booster rockets each producing 23MN of thrust. Max thrust T is achieved after 0.5sec. Calculate the acceleration of the shuttle 0.5sec after ignition, taking the mass of the shuttle to be 2.0^10(to the power of)6 kg at this instance.
Relevant Equations: Fnet=ma, w=mg

Sorry there, relatively new to this topic. Anyways, from my understanding of the formula, the force is equal to mass times acceleration. So, is it safe to assume that the total force is simply all the forces from the engines added up? (1.7MN^3+23MN^2), while the mass is (2.0^106 kg)^ 9.8m/s^2?
Therefore, the Acceleration would be the force divided by the mass?
Physicists at the time defined Newton as a unit based on Newton's second law, which defined the force required to accelerate a kilogram of material at one meter per second as 1N
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top