How Is Current Distributed in a Complex Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crhscoog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
crhscoog
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


frqprob.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



i. First I combined 20ohm and 30ohm to make 50ohms. Since this 50ohms and 100ohms is in parallel I have to use 1/Rtotal= 1/r1 + 1/r2... etc and got 33.333 ohms. I added this to 10ohms which ends up being 43.333 ohms. Then I used V=IR and got I=.277. So would .277 be the current going through 10ohm and half of that going through 100ohm and quarter of .277 going through 20ohm and 30ohm?

So from here I would get half of .277 as current for 100ohm and a fourth of .277 as current for both 20 and 30 ohm. and using P=RI^2 i would get a total of 2.925W for power consumption??

and with 2.925 I determine that it takes 3418.803419 hours to provide 10kJ of electrical energy??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I = 0.277A right? Total power consumption assumes the total resistance, which is R = 43.3\Omega, right? So when I carried out the calculation, I ended up with P = 3.322 W

2. P = 3.322 W = 3.322 \frac{J}{s} Therefore, 10000 J = 3.322\frac{J}{s} \cdot x(s), right? So you will end up with x = \frac{10000 J}{3.322\frac{J}{s}} = 3010(s)

\frac{3010}{3600}h = 0.836 h = 50.16 min

So 50 minutes and 10 seconds is what it takes to provide 10kJ of energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top