How Is Electric Potential Calculated for a Charged Wire Bent into a Circle?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric potential at point P from a uniformly charged wire bent into a circle, one must consider the linear charge density of 2.2 μC/m and the radius of 3.7 m. The potential can be determined using the equation V = - integral (E dl), which requires integration over the wire's length. The user expresses confusion regarding the integration process and the limits needed for the calculation. After spending significant time on the problem, they indicate a realization of the solution. Understanding the integration of electric field contributions from each segment of the wire is crucial for solving this problem.
Arshad_Physic
Messages
50
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A wire that has a uniform linear charge density of 2.2 μC/m is bent into the shape as
shown below, with radius 3.7 m.

The Coulomb constant is 8.98755 × 109 N · m2/C2. Find the electrical potential at point p.

Here is the image:
http://s769.photobucket.com/albums/xx339…

(Radius is 3.7 and the distance of line is 7.4)
Answer in units of V.



Homework Equations



V = - integral (E dl)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am at a total loss as to how to solve this. First I thought that since the density is uniform, we won't have to integrate. But I am guessing that integration will be done on this one first for the line and then for the circle. But I am totally stuck as to what to integrate, and what will be the limits of integration.

On this one I spent about 1 hour, but I have reached to no conclusion. I need help on this one! :)

PLEASE HELP! :)

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
okay - time is up now - now I can see the solution...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top