How Is Kinetic Friction Calculated in Skier's Uphill Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by kinetic friction and the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force for a skier moving uphill. The skier's mass is 64.9 kg, with an initial speed of 8.95 m/s and a final speed of 4.40 m/s after coasting 2.31 m up a 23.4° slope. The equations used include work-energy principles and the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. Participants identify a potential sign error in their calculations, ultimately confirming the work done by friction as -1390 J. The conversation highlights common mistakes in physics problems, particularly regarding sign conventions.
onyxorca
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 64.9-kg skier coasts up a snow-covered hill that makes an angle of 23.4 ° with the horizontal. The initial speed of the skier is 8.95 m/s. After coasting a distance of 2.31 m up the slope, the speed of the skier is 4.40 m/s. (a) Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force that acts on the skis. (b) What is the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force?

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs2216/art/qb/qu/c06/EAT_12258936060120_435296769488702.gif

Homework Equations



W=FX 2K=mv^2 a=(v^2-v0^2)/2x

The Attempt at a Solution



for (b) i used f=ma-mg sinθ,

or 1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a),

but neither was right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a)
looks good to me. What did you get?
 
Delphi51 said:
1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a)
looks good to me. What did you get?

I think there may be a sign error here?

\rm \Delta E = K_f - K_i + U_{f_{grav}}-U_{i_{grav}} = \frac{1}{2}m (v_f^2-v_i^2) +mg s Sin\theta = -1390J
 
Correct! thank you!
 
onyxorca said:
Correct! thank you!

You're welcome. If I had $1 for every time I've made a sign error in my lifetime, well, I'd own beach-front property in South Hampton. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top