How is Luminosity Converted to Distance in Binary Star Period Calculation?

kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The problem is attached, and the official answer is given.
The step in the answer does not make a lot of sense to me.
How does the luminosity L converted directly into distance d, and why is the solar distance is used?
And where does the dm=0.75 come from.
It's just not making sense to me...

Please expand and explain the steps in the answer a bit. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Capture2.PNG
    Capture2.PNG
    24.6 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
m for the binary system is

m = -2.5log10L + C

m' for a single star is

m' = -2.5log10(L/2) + C
m' = -2.5[log10L - log102] + C
m' = [-2.5log10L + C] + 2.5log102
m' = m + 2.5log102 = m + δm

δm = 2.5log102 = 0.752575... ≈ 0.75
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The relation between magnitude and distance comes from the inverse square law for the radiation intensity. If you double the distance to a star than its radiation intensity drops to (1/2)2 = 1/4 and so forth so if you know the apparent magnitude you can figure the distance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top