How is our speed (~605km/s) derived from the CMB dipole anisotropy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lenfromkits
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Dipole Speed
AI Thread Summary
The speed of approximately 605 km/s is derived from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) redshift by measuring the difference between the highest and lowest redshift values observed in multiple directions. This differential indicates the motion of the Milky Way relative to the CMB. The relationship between redshift and velocity is linear at low speeds, meaning that changes in frequency correspond directly to changes in speed without needing to apply the Lorentz factor. While relativistic effects become significant at higher velocities, they are not necessary for understanding the CMB dipole anisotropy at the speeds discussed. Overall, the calculation of 605 km/s is based on observed redshift data rather than complex relativistic mathematics.
lenfromkits
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Hi. How does the number 605km/s come from the observed CMB wavelength of 1.9mm?
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation)

Please only reply in 'English' and not a bunch of calculations because Google already provides lots of calculations. I am trying to get a general understanding in English.

Most importantly, I am trying to understand if any relativistic math is used to get the speed. Is the Lorentz factor (sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) used in there anywhere? I have applied this formula to the speed of 605 in a project and arrived at a notable result but need to know if I have simply reversed a calc that was done by someone to arrive at the 605.

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is derived from the CMB redshift taken in multiple direction. Subtracting the highest from lowest redshift gives a differential of about 600 kms.
 
Chronos said:
It is derived from the CMB redshift taken in multiple direction. Subtracting the highest from lowest redshift gives a differential of about 600 kms.

Thanks. How then is velocity derived from Red Shift exactly? Are certain speed associated with certain changes in frequency? Is it linear or does it follow the lorentz factor curve?
 
Code:
           E     h
            n   s
             g i
              l

Redshift = English 

             nE
            g
            l    
            i
             sh
I don't understand how the restriciton to English is supposed to make communication easier. However, the relationship is linear for low verlocities.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top