• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

How is power proportional to acceleration?

  • Thread starter hola
  • Start date
38
0
The above scenario is when distance and mass are held constant. ~ denotes proportional to
My work:
P= m*a*d/t
P~ a/t

a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant

so P~ a^3/2

Is this right?
 

Answers and Replies

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
It is important to say that you assumed a constant force. (what does 'd held constant' mean anyway?)

Personally, I don't see a flaw in your reasoning.

But wait 'til it gets approved or demolished by someone more knowledgable before you start expecting your nobel prize.
 
1,222
2
Is this right?
Absolutely not. If you think that you can "hold d constant" and still have a non-zero energy transfer rate (power) then you don't even understand work. The error in your mathematics is the point when you say:

P= m*a*d/t

It should be:

P= m*a*(d(t)-d0)/(t-t0)

In other words, d should be "delta d" or "the change in d". But more importantly, on a physical level you are talking about transfering energy by accelerating in place, which is absurd.


"a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant" This is mathematically laughable. Acceleration is the second derivative of position. If position is a constant, acceleration is zero.
 
lightgrav
Homework Helper
1,248
30
Crosson: most people use "d" for distance, which is (x_f - x_i),
and it was pretty clear from the context.

Hola: your condition shows power proportional to a/t ,
(with fixed distance and mass). This is NOT proportional to a,
since the time to travel distance "d" is NOT the same for different P.
This is obvious since higher power run will have quicker acceleration
(your formulas presume CONTANT-ACCELERATION during each run)
By the way, this is *Average* power!
 
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
I'm not sure I see your point lightgrav. I'll rewrite hola's work with more precision. Asume an object of mass m at rest at t_0 = 0 acted on my a constant force F, from which results an acceleration a. Then, after a time t', the object has traveled a distance d, and the rate at which work as been done by force (the power) for that period is P = Fd/t' = mad/t'. But since the force is constant, the equation of position of the object is x(t) = 0.5at², for which we know a solution to be d = 0.5at'² <==> [itex]t' = \sqrt{2d/a}[/itex]. Hence we can rewrite the power for that particular trajectory of the object as

[tex]P = \frac{mad}{\sqrt{2d/a}} = \frac{ma\sqrt{ad}}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{d}{2}}ma^{3/2}[/tex]
 
lightgrav
Homework Helper
1,248
30
Point #1 : the title prase "Power proportional to acceleration" does not apply
to P~a/t nor to P~a^3/2 . (Does Hola know what proportional means?)
Point #2 : "average Power over a given distance" is not the same thing as P.
Unmodified, unqualified Power seems to misleadingly imply constant P,
or that it is a relationship that could be used in most any situation.
But knowing that P ~ F.v ~ a.v makes it obvious that here (a=const) P ~ t .
 

Related Threads for: How is power proportional to acceleration?

  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
939
Replies
16
Views
2K
Top