How is power proportional to acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between power, acceleration, and distance, particularly under the assumption of constant mass and distance. Participants critique the initial formula for power, emphasizing that distance should represent a change rather than a constant value. They argue that the assertion of power being proportional to acceleration is flawed, as acceleration cannot be constant if distance is held constant. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between average power and instantaneous power, noting that average power calculations can mislead interpretations of proportionality. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial reasoning lacks a proper understanding of the physical principles involved.
hola
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The above scenario is when distance and mass are held constant. ~ denotes proportional to
My work:
P= m*a*d/t
P~ a/t

a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant

so P~ a^3/2

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is important to say that you assumed a constant force. (what does 'd held constant' mean anyway?)

Personally, I don't see a flaw in your reasoning.

But wait 'til it gets approved or demolished by someone more knowledgeable before you start expecting your nobel prize.
 
Is this right?

Absolutely not. If you think that you can "hold d constant" and still have a non-zero energy transfer rate (power) then you don't even understand work. The error in your mathematics is the point when you say:

P= m*a*d/t

It should be:

P= m*a*(d(t)-d0)/(t-t0)

In other words, d should be "delta d" or "the change in d". But more importantly, on a physical level you are talking about transfering energy by accelerating in place, which is absurd.


"a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant" This is mathematically laughable. Acceleration is the second derivative of position. If position is a constant, acceleration is zero.
 
Crosson: most people use "d" for distance, which is (x_f - x_i),
and it was pretty clear from the context.

Hola: your condition shows power proportional to a/t ,
(with fixed distance and mass). This is NOT proportional to a,
since the time to travel distance "d" is NOT the same for different P.
This is obvious since higher power run will have quicker acceleration
(your formulas presume CONTANT-ACCELERATION during each run)
By the way, this is *Average* power!
 
I'm not sure I see your point lightgrav. I'll rewrite hola's work with more precision. Asume an object of mass m at rest at t_0 = 0 acted on my a constant force F, from which results an acceleration a. Then, after a time t', the object has traveled a distance d, and the rate at which work as been done by force (the power) for that period is P = Fd/t' = mad/t'. But since the force is constant, the equation of position of the object is x(t) = 0.5at², for which we know a solution to be d = 0.5at'² <==> t&#039; = \sqrt{2d/a}. Hence we can rewrite the power for that particular trajectory of the object as

P = \frac{mad}{\sqrt{2d/a}} = \frac{ma\sqrt{ad}}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{d}{2}}ma^{3/2}
 
Point #1 : the title prase "Power proportional to acceleration" does not apply
to P~a/t nor to P~a^3/2 . (Does Hola know what proportional means?)
Point #2 : "average Power over a given distance" is not the same thing as P.
Unmodified, unqualified Power seems to misleadingly imply constant P,
or that it is a relationship that could be used in most any situation.
But knowing that P ~ F.v ~ a.v makes it obvious that here (a=const) P ~ t .
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top