How Is Scattered Flux Density Measured from a Ruby Laser in the Atmosphere?

Earthland
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
An unpolarized ruby laser operated at 0.7 μm is projected vertically into a clear sky to investigate the density of the atmosphere. A detector located 10 km from the base of the laser is used to receive the flux density scattered from the laser beam by air molecules. Assuming that the laser output has a uniform distribution of flux density F0 across the beam (i.e., I0 = F0sr), and neglecting the effects of multiple scattering, find the scattered flux density at 6 and 10 km received by a detector whose field of view in a plane is 0.05 rad. Use scattering cross section σs = 1.6*10-27 cm2

Answer given:

F≅F0l*1.37*10-11 (at 10 km)

Homework Equations



Scattered flux density is calculated as I*ΔΩ.

I = (I0/r2 )*σs*P(θ)/4π

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Let the field of view in a plane be Δ=0.05 rad.

Then ΔΩ should be ΔΩ=πΔ2/4

P(θ) = 3/4 * (1+cos2(θ))=3/4

However, if I try to calculate

(F0/π*r2 )*σs*(3/16π)*πΔ2/4

where r = 10km, the answer would be something like ~10-40
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having a little trouble understanding the geometry of this one. How is the scattered beam being observed? .05 rad in a plane=how high does this extend? Is it a square/circular .05 or does it follow the whole beam over an extended distance? I also see no info on the power output and beam divergence of the ruby laser.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top