How is the EM-Force between current wires calculated in this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theperthian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Wires
theperthian
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] EM-Force between current wires

Homework Statement



Problem 105 in chapter 27 Tipler and Mosca for those playing at home...

A long straight wire carries a current of 20 A, as shown in the figure. A rectangular coil
with 2 sides parallel to the straight wire has sides 5 cm and 10 cm with the near side at a
distance 2 cm from the wire. The coil carries a current of 5 A. (a) Find the force on each
segment of the rectangular coil due to the current in the long straight wire. (b) What is the
net force on the coil?

27-105.jpg


Homework Equations



good question
i used B= (mu)*I/(2*pi*r) [sorry, i can't use latex...]
and F=BIL

The Attempt at a Solution



The answers are F(2)= 100*10^-4N, F(4)= -0.286*10^-4N

For the two sides parallel (the 10cm ones),
I found B(a)=0.0002T
B(b)=0.0000571T
The other two wouldn't be effected cos they're perpendicular

F=BIL
F(a)=4*10^-4N
F(b)=1.14*10^-4N
...which are wrong

Is it something to do with the area and hence flux and shiznizzle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wait a minute team, you would use different current values in the two equations, because one is the field due to one wire, and the second is the force on the other wire right?? ooooooooh, of course...

bahaha, got to love how i only solved it AFTER i posted it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top