How is the Universe Constantly Increasing in Entropy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of entropy in closed and non-closed systems, questioning the idea that an increase in a system's entropy must correspond to a decrease in its surroundings. Participants clarify that while a closed system's entropy is independent of its surroundings, overall entropy in the universe is still increasing due to interactions in non-closed systems. The conversation highlights confusion around the conservation of entropy and the implications of heat transfer on entropy changes. The equation for change in entropy, ΔS = Q/T, is referenced to illustrate how heat absorption affects entropy in both the system and the environment. Ultimately, the consensus is that while local decreases in entropy can occur, the total entropy of the universe continues to rise.
ninjarawr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
For example, an increase in the entropy of the system will be exactly equal to the entropy decrease of the surroundings. So the net change in the entropy of the system and its surroundings is zero.

Putting this in perspective to all the systems and environments in our universe, how is the universe always increasing in entropy?


Thanks in advance!

ninjarawr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not really sure the if the entropy of a system increases, the entropy of the surroundings will decrease. There's no conservation of entropy-law. If you have a closed system, it's entropy has nothing to do with the surroundings.
 
ninjarawr said:
For example, an increase in the entropy of the system will be exactly equal to the entropy decrease of the surroundings.

Oh, really? Prove it :smile:
 
I think what may have confused you is that if you look at a 'non-closed' system you can observe an entropy decrease, but this means that entropy somewhere else was increased.
So entropy is still increasing overall.

Perhaps you read something like that and generalized it to a conservation law..
However, it doesn't work the other way around. So an entropy increase does not have to accompany an entropy decrease.
 
Gear.0 said:
I think what may have confused you is that if you look at a 'non-closed' system you can observe an entropy decrease, but this means that entropy somewhere else was increased.
So entropy is still increasing overall.

Perhaps you read something like that and generalized it to a conservation law..
However, it doesn't work the other way around. So an entropy increase does not have to accompany an entropy decrease.

The statement "an increase in the entropy of the system will be exactly equal to the entropy decrease of the surroundings. So the net change in the entropy of the system and its surroundings is zero" is straight of a kaplan physics review book for the MCAT. It didn't make sense to me because it does imply a conservation law, and then it confused me even more on the concept of entropy...if the equation for change in entropy is delta S = Q/T, if the environment loses heat to the system, wouldn't the environment have a negative delta S (and the system positive)? Does that mean entropy is decreased in the environment, and increased by the same amount by the system?
 
Fom Wikipwdia: "In systems held at constant temperature, the change in entropy, ΔS, is given by the equation

\Delta S = \frac{Q}{T},

where Q is the amount of heat absorbed by the system in an isothermal and reversible process in which the system goes from one state to another, and T is the absolute temperature at which the process is occurring."

ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top