How is the Laplacian Applied to Retarded Potential?

CMBR
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not understanding how the laplacian is creating those 3 terms in 5.4.5.

I just understand the basics that laplacian on f(x,y) = d2f/dx2 + d2f/dy2. Can someone elaborate?

Thanks in advance.

EDIT:
Just realized this is an identity of vector calculus (second derivative of 2 scalars)...
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 656
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplace operator in three dimensions is
\Delta=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{\nabla}=\partial_x^2+\partial_y^2+\partial_z^2.
Now you have a product of functions, and you can simply use the product rule of differentiation to evaluate it.

This is, however not very clever, because then you have to handle the dependence of \rho on \vec{r} in the formula for the retarded potential. It's not undoable but inconvenient.

It's always wise to rewrite electromagnetic equations in relativistically covariant form. For the retarded potential this simply means to introduce a \delta distribution,
\phi(t,\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi} \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}t' \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \delta(t'-t+R/c) \frac{\rho(t',\vec{x}')}{R}.
Now the Laplacian is much easier to evaluate. Also note that
\Delta \frac{1}{R}=-4 \pi \delta(R).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top