How Is the Particle Horizon Distance Calculated in a Universe with Dark Energy?

June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Numerically integrate and report the particle horizon distance today for the currently fa-
vored model \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25,\omega=-1. Assume the scaled Hubble constant to be h = 0.72, and report the particle horizon in billions of lyr (Gyr).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Horizen distance d=\int_0^{t0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}, so in a flat universe a(t)=(t/t0)^{2/(3(1+3\omega))},
so that we have $$d=\frac{2}{1+3\omega}H_0^{-1}$$,but this has nothing to do with \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
 
phyzguy said:
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
Oh that's right! So how do I derive a(t) from Friedmann equations?
 
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
 
phyzguy said:
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
Thank you! So that would be \frac{H^2}{H_0^2}=\frac{0.25}{a^3}+0.75,if we combine this with H=\frac{\dot{a}}{a} and I solved this equation (online), it gave me http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP226920fg7hgi3c9658be000033830f2a7886e3e4?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=20&w=550.&h=47. ? (a(x) means a(t) here). I think this isn't right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top