How Is the Second Term Derived in the 2D Riemann Curvature Tensor?

Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Show that the Riemann curvature tensor in 2d is given by ##R_{abcd} =\frac{R}{2}(g_{ac}g_{bd} - g_{ad}g_{bc}) ##
Relevant Equations
## R = R_{ab} g^{ab} ## and ## R_{ab} = R_{acb}^{c}##
Since in 2D the riemman curvature tensor has only one independent component, ## R = R_{ab} g^{ab} ## can be reversed to get the riemmann curvature tensor.

Write
## R_{ab} = R g_{ab} ##

Now
## R g_{ab} = R_{acbd} g^{cd}##
Rewrite this as
## R_{acbd} = Rg_{ab} g_{cd} ##
My issue is I'm not sure how they caught a second term? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Woolyabyss said:
Now
## R g_{ab} = R_{acbd} g^{cd}##
Rewrite this as
## R_{acbd} = Rg_{ab} g_{cd} ##
My issue is I'm not sure how they caught a second term? Any help would be appreciated.

Your candidate Riemann tensor doesn't have the expected index-symmetries.
Generally, you can't undo a contraction to arrive at your last line.
There may be other expressions that lead to the same contracted term.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top