How Is the Third Dark Fringe Calculated in Diffraction Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheechnchong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from the center of the central bright fringe to the third dark fringe in a diffraction problem involving light with a wavelength of 668 nm passing through a slit of 6.73 x 10^-6 m. The user attempts to solve the problem using the equation sin(theta) = m(wavelength/width) and sets up a relationship involving tan(theta) to find the distance x on the screen. After calculations, the user arrives at a distance of 0.55 m, which differs from the book's solution of 0.576 m. The user expresses confusion regarding this discrepancy and seeks clarification on whether their approach or the book's answer is correct. The thread highlights the challenges in applying diffraction equations and the importance of verifying calculations in physics problems.
cheechnchong
Messages
132
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Light that has a wavelength of 668 nm passes through a slit 6.73 x 10^-6 m wide and falls on a screen that is 1.85 m away. What is the distance on the screen from the center of the central bright fringe in the third dark fringe on either side?

Homework Equations



I will discuss this in the attempt at the solution; however, my attempt will based on sin (theta) = m(wavelength/ width)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have drawn a diagram of what the problem basically states. Anyways...I first tried to find the angle between the length (1.85 m) and the area where the fringe resides (I called it X). So...my setup for the angle looks like this tan (theta) = x/1.85.

Then, knowing that sin(theta) is similar (~) to tan (theta) I proceeded to find the answer by setting up x/1.85 = 3 (668x10^-9 m/ 6.73 x 10^-6 m) and found that x = 0.55 m.

^I used this equation: sin (theta) = m(wavelength/ width). Just in case there is any confusion!

I am confused with the answer discrepensy from my book and my approach...the book has the solution 0.576 m for the bright fringe. I am not sure whether my approach is wrong OR that the discrepensy is fine...Please let me know - even if there is a mathematical error (which I don't think is the case).

I appreciate all the help I can Get!
 
  • Like
Likes Joshua 95
Physics news on Phys.org
any help here?
 
^^^^?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top