How Is Thermo Efficiency Calculated in a Monatomic Gas Cycle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AriAstronomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Thermo
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the thermo efficiency of a monatomic gas cycle involving isothermal and constant-volume processes. Participants clarify the relationship between work done (W), heat transferred (Q_h and Q_l), and efficiency, with a focus on determining the energy cost for the cycle. The efficiency is expressed as the ratio of work to heat input, leading to a calculated efficiency of approximately 0.273. Key points include the importance of correctly identifying heat flow directions and contributions to work during different phases of the cycle. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately determining the efficiency of the gas cycle.
AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Thermo Efficiency question!

Homework Statement


Figure P22.53 represents n mol of an ideal monatomic
gas being taken through a cycle that consists of two
isothermal processes at temperatures 3Ti and Ti and two
constant-volume processes. For each cycle, determine, in terms of n, R, and Ti , (a) the net energy transferred
by heat to the gas and (b) the efficiency of an engine
operating in this cycle.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Now, I've solved part a), and get W = 2nRTln2 (difference between top and bottom portions), can't get part b). I know that efficiency = energy sought/ energy cost = W/Q_h, but they don't really specify in the question where the energy intake is, or energy cost. The answer is 0.273... I've found that for each cycle:
the sides both equal dU = dQ = 3nRT, the top Q = 3nRTln2, bottom Q = nRTln2. Seems like the 'energy cost' based on e = .273 and W = 2nRTln2 should be 3+3ln2, no idea how that comes about though... perhaps somehow the 'cost' is over the top and side??

Ari
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.png
    Screenshot.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 376
Physics news on Phys.org


AriAstronomer said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, I've solved part a), and get W = 2nRTln2 (difference between top and bottom portions), can't get part b). I know that efficiency = energy sought/ energy cost = W/Q_h, but they don't really specify in the question where the energy intake is, or energy cost. The answer is 0.273... I've found that for each cycle:
the sides both equal dU = dQ = 3nRT, the top Q = 3nRTln2, bottom Q = nRTln2. Seems like the 'energy cost' based on e = .273 and W = 2nRTln2 should be 3+3ln2, no idea how that comes about though... perhaps somehow the 'cost' is over the top and side??
Determine the direction of the heat flow in each part of the graph. To do that you must be careful about the sign. Heat flow into the gas is positive. Heat flow out is negative. Total heat flow in is Qh. Total heat flow out is Qc. What is W in terms of Qh and Qc? From that you should be able to determine efficiency.

AM
 


Alright. Makes sense. W = Q_h - Q_l, and Q_h is all the positive contributions to the work, while Q_l is all the negative ones. When I do my calculations, I get the first two legs coming out positive, and the second two legs coming out negative, thus Q_h = 3nRT + 3nRTln2. Thanks Andrew.

Ari
 


AriAstronomer said:
Alright. Makes sense. W = Q_h - Q_l, and Q_h is all the positive contributions to the work, while Q_l is all the negative ones. When I do my calculations, I get the first two legs coming out positive, and the second two legs coming out negative, thus Q_h = 3nRT + 3nRTln2.
Generally correct. Strictly speaking Qh, being heat flow, consists of all the positive contributions to the heat flow, not the work. (This heat flow enables greater work to be done in the expansion phase).

You can determine the direction of heat flow qualitatively from the First Law. A constant volume increase in pressure requires heat flow into the gas (dQ = dU > 0). An isothermal expansion requires heat flow in (dQ = dW > 0).

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top