How Long Does It Take for Pressure to Increase in a Punctured Container?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physgeek64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effusion Pressure
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


A thin-walled container of volume 10−3 m3 is evacuated to a pressure of 10−7 mbar. The vessel is surrounded by air at 1 bar and 290 K. If a small hole of area 10−17 m2 is made in the wall of the container, how long does it take the pressure inside to rise to 10−6 mbar?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##\frac{dN}{dt}=A\phi = \frac{A<v> N}{4V}##
## \frac{dN}{N}=\frac{A<v>}{4V} t ##
##t=\frac{4V}{A<v>}\ln{\frac{P_2}{P_1}}##

However this requires us to know m and i can't see how to figure this out. Therefore i am assuming my solution is wrong...

Many thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physgeek64 said:

Homework Statement


A thin-walled container of volume 10−3 m3 is evacuated to a pressure of 10−7 mbar. The vessel is surrounded by air at 1 bar and 290 K. If a small hole of area 10−17 m2 is made in the wall of the container, how long does it take the pressure inside to rise to 10−6 mbar?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##\frac{dN}{dt}=A\phi = \frac{A<v> N}{4V}##
## \frac{dN}{N}=\frac{A<v>}{4V} t ##
##t=\frac{4V}{A<v>}\ln{\frac{P_2}{P_1}}##

However this requires us to know m and i can't see how to figure this out. Therefore i am assuming my solution is wrong...

Many thanks in advance
Your original differential equation is incorrect. You are assuming the effusion only goes in one direction is this problem (that is ok), but the equation should read ## \frac{dN}{dt}=\frac{A n \bar{v}}{4 } ## where ## n ## is the number of particles per unit volume of the outside air. (## N ## is the number of particles of air inside the container). This ## n ## is constant and does change. One number you will need is ## \bar{v} ##. Average speed ## \bar{v} ## in a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is given by ## \bar{v}= (\frac{8}{\pi}) (\frac{kT}{M})^{1/2} ## , editing: ## \bar{v}=(\frac{8 kT}{\pi M})^{1/2} ##, where ## M ## is the (approximate) mass of a molecule of air. Since ## N_2 ## has M.W.=28, and ## O_2 ## has M.W.=32 , using an average M.W.=30 is an ok approximation, even though the air is 78% ##N_2 ## and 21% ##O_2 ##.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
Your original differential equation is incorrect. You are assuming the effusion only goes in one direction is this problem (that is ok), but ## dN/dt=A n \bar{v}/4 ## where ## n ## is the number of particles per unit volume of the outside air. (## N ## is the number of particles of air inside the container). This ## n ## is constant and does change. One number you will need is ## \bar{v} ##. Average speed ## \bar{v} ## in a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is given by ## (\frac{8}{\pi}) (\frac{kT}{M})^{1/2} ## where ## M ## is the (approximate) mass of a molecule of air. Since ## N_2 ## has M.W.=28, and ## O_2 ## has M.W.=32 ## \bar{M.W}=30 ## is an ok approximation, even though the air is 78% ##N_2 ## and 21% ##O_2 ##.

Oh okay, so will i end up with a simple linear relationship between t and N?
 
Physgeek64 said:
Oh okay, so will i end up with a simple linear relationship between t and N?
Yes. The pressure inside the container is small enough compared to the outside pressure that the rate of effusion into it is much higher than any effusion back out. And yes, the effusion rate into it will be constant. ## \\ ## And don't forget to include the initial condition of ## N_o ## that you start with already inside the container. ## \\ ## Just for an additional detail: In its entirety ## \frac{dN}{dt}=A (\frac{n \bar{v}}{4}-\frac{N \bar{v}}{4 V}) ##, and this second term on the right side can be considered small compared to the first term for this problem. (No need to solve the more detailed exact differential equation, because the second term is negligible here).
 
Last edited:
@Physgeek64 See also the additions to post 4 above. ## \\ ## Also one minor correction to the above: ## \bar{v}=( \frac{8 kT}{\pi M})^{1/2 } ##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top