How Long for Electric Field to Vanish in a Photoelectron-Irradiated Capacitor?

Onias
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The negative plate of a charged, isolated parallel plate capacitor with a vacuum gap of width d and carrying a surface charge density s is uniformly irradiated with a short pulse of ultraviolet light whose photon energy is just enough to release a photoelectron at the surface with zero kinetic energy. The radiant energy per unit area deposited by the pulse is such that a photoelectron surface charge density of exactly s is generated. Derive an expression for t_van, the time taken following the ultraviolet pulse for the electric field to vanish everywhere between the plates. Evaluate t_van for s=0.1 micro Coulomb per unit area and d=1mm


Homework Equations


None given


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm very confused by the question, I'm really not sure which equations to use. Presumably, the photoelectron would produce an electric field which would interfere with the two plates, but does this mean I use the equations for polarisation? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. What's the electric field set up by the photon-excited electrons in the gap d?
2. Can you think of a relationship between h and the transit time, based on energy conservation?
 
Could you apply Lorentz' law and calculate the time it would take for the charge to reach the positive plate, when the charges would cancel and, thus, the electric field would vanish? Or am I conceptualizing this wrong?
 
I think you are right. Those photoelectrons got free from the metal at the same time, but with zero kinetic energy, so they are together at the negative plate initially. Feeling the electric field of the positive charges on the other plate, they start to move towards the positive plate together, with the same acceleration and velocity. Arriving there, the charges neutralize and the electric field vanishes.
 
I don't believe there are any magnetic effects to be considered here, so the Lorentz law is not relevant. The inductance of the gap has to be very small.

ehild has the right idea.
 
I might have the name wrong. The force on a charged particle:

F = q(E+(vXB))

Obviously the second term is zero. Anyway, thanks for your help, I have enough info to attempt the question at least :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top