How much are machine learning and NMR related in medical imaging?

AI Thread Summary
Machine learning is increasingly relevant in medical imaging, particularly in the context of technologies like NMR, PET, and CT scans. The integration of machine learning algorithms into medical imaging research is a significant area of development, with applications such as computer-assisted diagnosis gaining traction. Recent advancements include commercial products for tasks like atlas-based anatomical segmentation, although there are ongoing debates about their reliability. The field shows considerable potential for further improvement. Most research positions in this area typically require a PhD, indicating a high level of expertise is necessary for developing medical imaging technologies.
Domenico94
Messages
130
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone. By reading stuff on the Internet, I found many times the correlation between machine learning and NMR, or, better, algorithms that are implemented for that kind of technology( The same goes for PET, or CT scans.
The thing I want to ask is, how much do you think that the two things are related? You think that machine learning is used a lot in that kind of research, or is it still a thing that it's somehow neglected in that field? I'm talking esclusively of medicine and medical imaging, not in general.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
You might want to search for "computer assisted diagnosis" to get an idea of the state of the field. In general, this is a big area of research in medical imaging. Even basic tasks like atlas-based anatomical segmentation and delineation are just over the past few years coming out in commercial products, and even then there's a lot of debate over how reliable such systems are. So there is definitely a lot of room for improvement, if these are areas you're interested in.
 
Choppy said:
You might want to search for "computer assisted diagnosis" to get an idea of the state of the field. In general, this is a big area of research in medical imaging. Even basic tasks like atlas-based anatomical segmentation and delineation are just over the past few years coming out in commercial products, and even then there's a lot of debate over how reliable such systems are. So there is definitely a lot of room for improvement, if these are areas you're interested in.
Actually I ve read of it...but I just didn't know how much that sector was developed..Now it seems more clear, thanks :)
You know if their positions for those jobs are for people with master s degree or only for PhD people? I mean, developing medical imaging stuff for that kind of machiner..Like MRI and so on...
 
I think most of the people actively doing research in such areas are at the PhD level.
 
  • Like
Likes Domenico94
Choppy said:
I think most of the people actively doing research in such areas are at the PhD level.
Understood:) thanks: P
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top