How Much Energy is Extracted from Uranium-235 Through Nuclear Fission?

  • Thread starter Thread starter element1945
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Uranium
element1945
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What proportion of the total energy in Uranium-235 is extracted through nuclear fission?

In 2001, the world electricity consumption was 13.81 trillion kWh. Assuming 50% efficiency in converting and distributing the power, and imagining that all production was nuclear, how many kg of radioactive waste (Xe and Sr) would have been created?

Homework Equations



1 n + 235U -> 140Xe + 94Sr + 2 n + gamma

1 MeV = 1.602x10^-13 J
1 kWh = 3.6x10^6 J

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the reaction and the binding energies the released energy is equal to 175 MeV.

how do i calculate the proportion of the extracted and total energy?

how do i use the % of efficiency and the global production to calculate the waste?
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i forgot that the total energy of Uranium is the binding energy i think that is 1786 MeV.
 
i don't know how to relate the total and the released energy, and how to relate the 50% efficiency with the released energy and the global consumption... please help :(?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top