How much energy is needed to place 4 positive charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy required to place four positive charges at the vertices of a square and determining the potential at each empty vertex during assembly. For the first problem, the user calculated the total potential energy using the formula PE = kQQ/r, arriving at a total of 5.4 x 10^7 J after considering all pairs of charges. In the second problem, there was confusion about how to calculate the potential at each vertex as charges are added one at a time. Clarifications were provided, indicating that the potential should be calculated for each empty vertex after placing each charge, rather than summing potentials. The interpretation of the second problem emphasizes calculating potentials sequentially without combining them.
shashaeee
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Can someone just confirm if I'm doing these two problems correctly ...

1. How much energy is needed to place 4 positive charges, each of magnitude +5mC, at the vertices of a square of side 2.5cm

2. Choose one way of assembling the charges and calculate the potential at each empty vertex as this set of charges is assembled.


For #1, I used the formula PE = kQQ/r

PE = 9.0 x 106J

and because there are 6 sets (4 sides and 2 diagonals) with similar lengths and charges, I added the PE values together, giving me a total of PET = 5.4 X 107J

For #2, I'm not sure what exactly its asking me to do, but I used the formula V = kQ/r

For the r, I used Pythagoreom Theorom to find the distance to the middle

V = 2.55 x 109V

and I'm not really sure, but there are 4 sets this time?

So Total Potential = VA1+VA2+VA3+VA4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, shashaeee.

For problem 1, did you treat the "diagonal" pairs as having the same distance r as the "side" pairs?

For problem 2, it appears to me that you want to think of assembling the square one charge at a time and at each step calculate the potential at the remaining empty vertices. So, suppose you started by placing one charge at the upper left corner of the square. You would then have 3 empty vertices. So, you should calculate the potential at each of those three empty vertices. Then suppose you add the second charge at the upper right corner. You would be left with 2 empty vertices. So, calculate the potential at those 2 empty vertices, and so on.
 
Oh, no I didn't! Thank you!


So for #2 ... basically ...

If my box was arranged as

1 _____3
|
|
2 _____ 4

V1 = V2+V3+V4

V12 = V3+V4

V123 = V4
 
My interpretation of #2 is just to calculate the potential at each empty corner, but don't add them together. So, when charge 1 is in place, you'll calculate V2, V3, and V4. When charges 1 and 2 are in place, you'll calculate new values for V3 and V4. When charges 1, 2 and 3 are in place, then you'll recalculate V4.

At least that's my reading of the problem. Hope I'm not misinterpreting it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top