How Much Force Is Needed to Tip a Loaded Cart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmcpolo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cart
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force needed to tip a loaded sheet rock cart weighing 79 pounds with a load of 1200 pounds. The total torque required to tip the cart is determined to be 411 ft-lbs, which translates to a pulling force of 134 pounds when considering the height of the force application. The calculations are sensitive to the angle of the cart, with variations in the angle significantly affecting the required force. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in their initial sketch regarding internal forces and appreciates the clarification provided. Accurate centroid calculations are emphasized as crucial for determining the tipping force.
cmcpolo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Attached is a sketch of a sheet rock cart. The cart weighs 79 pounds and I have indicated the location of the centroid. The load on the cart consists of several sheets of material that weigh 1200 pounds. I am trying to determine the pulling force required (F) to tip the cart over (assuming the hinge point A doesn't slide when the cart is pulled).

A little background...I am a professional engineer and I am trying to help a client but it has been quite a while since I took physics or statics. I have arrived at an answer of 87 lbs but was hoping for a check from someone with greater knowledge.

Thanks for any help.
 

Attachments

  • CCF02032010_00000.jpg
    CCF02032010_00000.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 523
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums. I get 134 pounds.

For me, it's easier to think in terms of how much torque is required to tip the cart, and then calculate the required force given its 3.07 ft height above the pivot point A.

Your drawing indicates that the cart centroid is 0.46 ft to the right of point A, so the cart contributes 0.46*79 = 36 ft-lbs to the required torque.

The horizontal distance from point A to the sheet rock's centroid is
0.66' - (2')*cos(80°) = 0.31 ft​
so the sheetrock requires a torque of 0.31*1200 = 375 ft-lbs.

The total toque required is 36+375 = 411 ft-lbs.

Given the 3.07' height of the force, a force of (411/3.07)=134 lbs is required to tip the cart.

Please make sure you follow my calculation, in particular where I calculate the location of the sheetrock's centroid.

Final note: the calculation is quite sensitive to the accuracy of the 80° figure. If it were actually 75°, the force becomes 67 lbs; for 85° it's 200 lbs.

Hope this helps.
 
Redbelly 98-
Thanks for taking that time to run through that calculation. After a bit more research after my post, i realized that I had incorrectly shown other forces in my sketch as they were internal forces. The correct calculation, as you have indicated, is the moment calculation with the centroids.

Thanks
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top