How much heat ΔQ is consumed to raise the ice temperature

AI Thread Summary
To raise the temperature of ice from -20°C to 0°C, the heat required (ΔQ) is calculated using the specific heat capacity of ice, which is approximately 2.1 kJ/kg·K. The discussion reveals a misunderstanding regarding the mass of ice and the heat capacity used, with initial calculations yielding an incorrect energy value of 2.49 * 10^-21 J. The correct mass of ice is estimated at 0.0715 kg, leading to a revised heat requirement of about 6 J. The time to achieve this heat transfer at a power output of 300 W is calculated to be around 2 minutes, but the methodology and units used in the calculations were questioned for accuracy.
Firben
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
1. How much heat ΔQ is consumed to raise the ice temperature from Ti = -20 Celsius to meltingpoint Tf = 0 ? how long does it take ?



2. dQ/dt = H = 300 W

dQ = cmΔT




3 I got it to be 2.49 * 10^-21 J. Is it right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Firben said:
1. How much heat ΔQ is consumed to raise the ice temperature from Ti = -20 Celsius to meltingpoint Tf = 0 ? how long does it take ?



2. dQ/dt = H = 300 W

dQ = cmΔT




3 I got it to be 2.49 * 10^-21 J. Is it right ?
You will have to provide a bit more information. How much ice are we talking about? Does the heat source provide 300 W?

AM
 


I don't know anything about the mass.

c = 1/m * dQ/dt (1)

c = 4190 kJ/kg (heat capacity of water)

Q = mcΔT (2)

From equation (1): m = (dQ/dt)/c (3)

m = 300W/4190 k//kg = 0.0715 kg

(2) Q = (0.0715 kg)(4190 kJ/kg)(273-15-253.15)K <==>

Q = 5.99 =~ 6 J

t = Q/H (4) (heat/power)

t(time) = 6.0 J/300 W = 0.02 J/s = 2 min

Is it right ?
 


How did you get the equation (1)?
 


I just solved it, an oversight
 


The units are wrong. c has units of energy/mass. 1/m(dQ/dt) has units of energy/(mass x time).

Your derivation of m makes no sense. You are using the wrong heat capacity. You have to use the heat capacity of ice, not liquid water. Are you sure you got it solved?

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top