How much heat energy is produced when a steel ball falls into sand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter biamin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Heat
AI Thread Summary
A steel ball falling from a height of 20 meters into sand converts some of its potential energy into heat. The work done by gravity can be expressed as W = mgh, where m is the mass of the ball, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height. Since half of the work done is converted into heat energy, the heat gained by the ball can be calculated using Q = ½W. The specific heat capacity of steel is necessary to determine the temperature change, which remains independent of mass due to the cancellation of mass in the equations. This approach allows for calculating the heat energy produced without needing the specific mass of the ball.
biamin
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A steel ball falls from a height of 20m into a pile of sand. If 1/2 the energy ends up i as heat in the ball,m how much is the ball heated?

I am starting out with the work equation.
Work = force * displacement.
Work = 9.81m/s^2(20m)
Work = 196.2 m^2/s^2


I am having trouble relating this to a Joule or calorie or some type of heat energy.

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF biamin!

You forgot the mass (m) in F = mg. The force you used just had g in it, but no mass. So it wasn't really a force at all, and that's why the units weren't working out for you.
 
unfortunately the problem gives no mass for the steel ball. I am not sure how to approach the problem.

The only other formula I can think of to use is the one for potential energy (mass*gravity*height) but that has a mass in it as well.

Any thoughts?
 
biamin said:
unfortunately the problem gives no mass for the steel ball. I am not sure how to approach the problem.

The only other formula I can think of to use is the one for potential energy (mass*gravity*height) but that has a mass in it as well.

Yeah, in fact, that's not even really a different method. After all, using work = force*distance, you'd get force = mg, and distance = h, hence work = mgh. This makes sense, since the work done by gravity is always the negative of the change in potential energy.

biamin said:
Any thoughts?

It doesn't seem to me like you have enough information to get a numerical answer. Express the amount of energy in terms of the unknown mass, m, and move on?

EDIT: I just had a thought. Maybe the question is asking for the temperature change of the ball?? Since the temperature change resulting from a given amount of heat also depends on m, the m's will cancel from both sides of the equation (in other words, the result will be independent of mass, since more massive balls would require more heat to increase in temperature by the same amount, but they would also have more work done on them by gravity, and these two effects would exactly cancel). So you'd have something like:

heat energy gained = 1/2 work done on ball

Q = ½W

mcΔT = ½mgh

where c is the specific heat capacity of steel in J/(g°C) , which you just have to look up. You can see that mass doesn't matter for the end result.
 
Thanks Cepheid,

The specific heat capacity was the bit of information I was needing to add to the equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top